The conjecture on the values of n for which M(n)=2
The conjecture on the values of n for which M(n)=2
Let denote the minimum number of distinct positive integers in an -tuple whose second elementary symmetric sum equals its th elementary symmetric sum. For , consider the values of for which .
Conjecture. The only values of such that are
In particular,
This is motivated by the reduction of the case to integral points on the curves , together with explicit analyses for small and the fact that the associated curves have genus at least for . The asserted absence of further integral points for larger is based on numerical calculations and remains open.
Progress summary
The proposed list remains an unproved conjecture, with no verified new examples or proof found.
The conjecture claims that exactly satisfy , and therefore that the minimum number of distinct entries eventually has lower limit . It was stated in a 2022 paper, where the final exclusions were explicitly left conjectural.
Known results
- The case reduces to integral points on .
- Explicit analysis for and yields .
- For , the associated curves have genus ; numerical calculations suggest no further relevant integral points, but do not prove this.
- A 2026 paper treats broader elementary-symmetric equations but reports no proof or counterexample for this specific conjecture.
Current status (as of August 2026): The reduction and the explicitly analyzed cases are established, but completeness of the list and the resulting claim about remain open.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Piotr Miska and Maciej Ulas, “On the Diophantine equation σ_2(X_n)=σ_n(X_n)”, arXiv:2203.03942 (2022).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
The proposed classification
fails in both directions.
First, take the nondecreasing positive integer tuple
Its product is
and separating pairs according to how many entries equal gives
Thus is a solution with exactly two distinct entries, so . A constant solution of length would require
No positive integer satisfies this equation: gives , while gives . Consequently
although is absent from the proposed list.
Second, the constant tuple satisfies
and therefore
although appears in the proposed list.
Both underlying examples already occur immediately before the conjecture in its source: the displayed conjectural classification is inconsistent with those preceding results. A corrected completeness statement would be a different problem.