Fiendish knot conjecture on tunnel-number additivity

About 27 years old · traced to

Let K1,K2⊂S3K_1,K_2\subset S^3, write K=K1#K2K=K_1\#K_2, and let E(Ki)E(K_i) denote the exterior of KiK_i. Let t(Ki)t(K_i) denote the tunnel number, and call a Heegaard splitting minimal genus if its Heegaard surface has the smallest possible genus. A minimal-genus splitting has a primitive meridian when it admits the corresponding primitive-meridian configuration. Fiendish knot conjecture.

t(K)=t(K1)+t(K2)+1t(K)=t(K_1)+t(K_2)+1

if and only if both E(K1)E(K_1) and E(K2)E(K_2) do not have minimal-genus Heegaard splittings with primitive meridians. This conjecture characterizes the stated one-unit failure of tunnel-number additivity in terms of the absence of primitive meridians; the source attributes it to the case of fiendish knots and leaves it unresolved.

References

Primary source

Yoav Moriah, “Connected sums of knots and weakly reducible Heegaard splittings”, arXiv:math/9912171 (2003).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.