Fiendish knot conjecture on tunnel-number additivity

From papers

Let K1,K2S3K_1,K_2\subset S^3, write K=K1#K2K=K_1\#K_2, and let E(Ki)E(K_i) denote the exterior of KiK_i. Let t(Ki)t(K_i) denote the tunnel number, and call a Heegaard splitting minimal genus if its Heegaard surface has the smallest possible genus. A minimal-genus splitting has a primitive meridian when it admits the corresponding primitive-meridian configuration. Fiendish knot conjecture.

t(K)=t(K1)+t(K2)+1t(K)=t(K_1)+t(K_2)+1

if and only if both E(K1)E(K_1) and E(K2)E(K_2) do not have minimal-genus Heegaard splittings with primitive meridians. This conjecture characterizes the stated one-unit failure of tunnel-number additivity in terms of the absence of primitive meridians; the source attributes it to the case of fiendish knots and leaves it unresolved.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Yoav Moriah, “Connected sums of knots and weakly reducible Heegaard splittings”, arXiv:math/9912171 (2003).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.