Burns's strengthened Rubin–Stark congruence

About 19 years old · traced to

Let II be the augmentation ideal of Z[Γ]\mathbb{Z}[\Gamma], let ϵ\epsilon be the element supplied by the Rubin–Stark conjecture, and let Φ∈ι(ΛnU∗)\Phi\in\iota(\Lambda^n U^*). Let RegΓΦReg_{\Gamma}^{\Phi} denote the corresponding equivariant regulator, and let hk,S,Th_{k,S,T} be the modified class number. Burns's strengthened Rubin–Stark conjecture. Assuming the Rubin–Stark conjecture, for every Φ∈ι(ΛnU∗)\Phi\in\iota(\Lambda^n U^*) one has Φ(ϵ)∈Z[Γ]\Phi(\epsilon)\in\mathbb{Z}[\Gamma] and

Φ(ϵ)≡hk,S,TRegΓΦ(modIrk−n+1).\Phi(\epsilon)\equiv h_{k,S,T}Reg_{\Gamma}^{\Phi}\pmod{I^{r_k-n+1}}.

This strengthens the integral Rubin–Stark assertion by prescribing the leading augmentation-ideal term through an equivariant regulator. The source does not state whether this strengthened conjecture is resolved.

References

Primary source

Ki-Seng Tan, “Generalized Stark formulae over function fields”, arXiv:math/0701061 (2007).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.