Burns's strengthened Rubin–Stark congruence

From papers

Let II be the augmentation ideal of Z[Γ]\mathbb{Z}[\Gamma], let ϵ\epsilon be the element supplied by the Rubin–Stark conjecture, and let Φι(ΛnU)\Phi\in\iota(\Lambda^n U^*). Let RegΓΦReg_{\Gamma}^{\Phi} denote the corresponding equivariant regulator, and let hk,S,Th_{k,S,T} be the modified class number. Burns's strengthened Rubin–Stark conjecture. Assuming the Rubin–Stark conjecture, for every Φι(ΛnU)\Phi\in\iota(\Lambda^n U^*) one has Φ(ϵ)Z[Γ]\Phi(\epsilon)\in\mathbb{Z}[\Gamma] and

Φ(ϵ)hk,S,TRegΓΦ(modIrkn+1).\Phi(\epsilon)\equiv h_{k,S,T}Reg_{\Gamma}^{\Phi}\pmod{I^{r_k-n+1}}.

This strengthens the integral Rubin–Stark assertion by prescribing the leading augmentation-ideal term through an equivariant regulator. The source does not state whether this strengthened conjecture is resolved.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ki-Seng Tan, “Generalized Stark formulae over function fields”, arXiv:math/0701061 (2007).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.