Floer-theoretic fibred Dehn twist exact sequence conjecture

Suppose that (M,ω)(M,\omega) and (Mˉ,ωˉ)(\bar{M},\bar{\omega}) are symplectic, that ρ ⁣:VMˉ\rho\colon V\to\bar{M} is an SkS^k-bundle with structure group SO(k+1)\operatorname{SO}(k+1), and that i ⁣:VMi\colon V\hookrightarrow M is an embedding with iω=ρωˉi^*\omega=\rho^*\bar{\omega}. Let ϕAut(M,ω)\phi\in\operatorname{Aut}(M,\omega) preserve VV and cover ϕˉAut(Mˉ,ωˉ)\bar{\phi}\in\operatorname{Aut}(\bar{M},\bar{\omega}). Let e=e(V)e=e(V)\cap\cdot be the Euler-class endomorphism of HF(ϕˉ)HF_*(\bar{\phi}), and let cone(e)\operatorname{cone}(e) be its mapping cone. Under the monotonicity and minimal-Maslov-index hypotheses ensuring that the maps aa and bb are defined, there are maps a ⁣:Hcone(e)HF(ϕ)a\colon H_*\operatorname{cone}(e)\to HF_*(\phi) and b ⁣:HF(ϕ)HF(ϕτV)b\colon HF_*(\phi)\to HF_*(\phi\circ\tau_V).

Fibred Dehn twist exact sequence conjecture. Under conditions which render aa and bb well-defined, they fit into a long exact sequence

Hcone(e)aHF(ϕ)bHF(ϕτV)H1cone(e).H_*\operatorname{cone}(e)\xrightarrow{a}HF_*(\phi)\xrightarrow{b}HF_*(\phi\circ\tau_V)\longrightarrow H_{*-1}\operatorname{cone}(e).

This is presented as a speculative consequence for Floer homology and is the subject of work in progress. The stated construction gives the maps under suitable monotonicity and minimal Maslov index assumptions, but the exactness assertion remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Tim Perutz, “Lagrangian matching invariants for fibred four-manifolds: II”, arXiv:math/0606062 (2007).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.