Babson–Kozlov vanishing conjecture for odd-cycle Hom-complexes

Let C2r+1C_{2r+1} be an odd cycle, let KnK_n be the complete graph on nn vertices, and let ϖ1n2(Hom(C2r+1,Kn))\varpi_1^{n-2}(\text{\tt Hom}(C_{2r+1},K_n)) denote the indicated Stiefel-Whitney characteristic class. Babson–Kozlov vanishing conjecture. For every positive integer rr and every n2n\geq 2, one has

ϖ1n2(Hom(C2r+1,Kn))=0.\varpi_1^{n-2}(\text{\tt Hom}(C_{2r+1},K_n))=0.

The source records proofs for r=1r=1 and for odd nn, as well as the case (r,n)=(2,4)(r,n)=(2,4), but leaves the general claim unresolved.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Dmitry N. Kozlov, “Chromatic numbers, morphism complexes, and Stiefel-Whitney characteristic classes”, arXiv:math/0505563 (2005).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.