Algebraic-cycle conjecture for Springer fibres

From papers

Let X=T(G/B)X=T^*(G/B) be the Springer resolution of the nilpotent cone Y=NgY={\mathcal N}\subset{\mathfrak g}^* in the coadjoint representation of a semisimple algebraic group GG, let yYy\in Y, and let Ey=π1(y)E_y=\pi^{-1}(y) be the corresponding Springer fibre. For each integer kk, consider its singular cohomology group Hk(Ey,Z)H^k(E_y,\mathbb Z). Algebraic-cycle conjecture for Springer fibres. In the assumptions of the symplectic-resolution theorem, Hk(Ey,Z)H^k(E_y,\mathbb Z) should be trivial for odd kk, and for even kk it should be spanned by cohomology classes of algebraic cycles. This strengthens the stated Hodge-theoretic conclusion for Springer fibres: the source notes that the assertion is known for the Springer resolution by work of C. de Concini, G. Lusztig and C. Procesi, but presents it as a proposed statement in the general assumptions of the theorem.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

D. Kaledin, “Sommese Vanishing for non-compact manifolds”, arXiv:math/0312271 (2005).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2003). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:math/0310186.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.