Algebraic-cycle conjecture for Springer fibres

About 23 years old · traced to

Let X=T∗(G/B)X=T^*(G/B) be the Springer resolution of the nilpotent cone Y=N⊂g∗Y={\mathcal N}\subset{\mathfrak g}^* in the coadjoint representation of a semisimple algebraic group GG, let y∈Yy\in Y, and let Ey=π−1(y)E_y=\pi^{-1}(y) be the corresponding Springer fibre. For each integer kk, consider its singular cohomology group Hk(Ey,Z)H^k(E_y,\mathbb Z). Algebraic-cycle conjecture for Springer fibres. In the assumptions of the symplectic-resolution theorem, Hk(Ey,Z)H^k(E_y,\mathbb Z) should be trivial for odd kk, and for even kk it should be spanned by cohomology classes of algebraic cycles. This strengthens the stated Hodge-theoretic conclusion for Springer fibres: the source notes that the assertion is known for the Springer resolution by work of C. de Concini, G. Lusztig and C. Procesi, but presents it as a proposed statement in the general assumptions of the theorem.

References

Primary source

D. Kaledin, “Sommese Vanishing for non-compact manifolds”, arXiv:math/0312271 (2005).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2003). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:math/0310186.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.