A-stability conjecture for the third-order biased IMEX scheme

Let the biased IMEX scheme be

y˙Δt[k]=f(yn)+13(2g(yn+1)+g(yn2)).\dot{y}_{\Delta t}^{[k]} = f(y^{n}) + \frac{1}{3}\bigl(2g(y^{n+1}) + g(y^{n-2})\bigr).

Here λ\lambda is the explicit eigenvalue, μ\mu is the implicit eigenvalue, and S\mathcal{S} is the explicit stability domain. A-stability conjecture. The scheme with k=3k=3 is AA-stable with respect to μ\mu for λS\lambda\in\mathcal{S}. The claim is supported in the paper by stability analysis, numerical investigation, and the absence of detected negative values, but no proof is provided.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Thor Gjesdal, “Implicit-explicit methods based on strong stability preserving multistep time discretizations”, arXiv:math/0304439 (2006).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.