Equivariant Seiberg–Witten Floer and Heegaard Floer homology correspondence

From papers

Let YY be a rational homology 33-sphere and let sSpinc(Y)\mathfrak{s}\in \operatorname{Spin}^c(Y) be a Spinc\operatorname{Spin}^c structure. The groups HF,U(1)SW,+(Y,s)HF^{SW,+}_{*,U(1)}(Y,\mathfrak{s}), HF,U(1)SW,(Y,s)HF^{SW,-}_{*,U(1)}(Y,\mathfrak{s}), HF^SW(Y,s)\widehat{HF}^{SW}_*(Y,\mathfrak{s}), and HFred,SW(Y,s)HF^{SW}_{\mathrm{red},*}(Y,\mathfrak{s}) are the equivariant Seiberg–Witten Floer groups, while HF+(Y,s)HF^+_*(Y,\mathfrak{s}), HF(Y,s)HF^-_*(Y,\mathfrak{s}), HF^(Y,s)\widehat{HF}_*(Y,\mathfrak{s}), and HFred,(Y,s)HF_{\mathrm{red},*}(Y,\mathfrak{s}) are the corresponding Heegaard Floer groups.

Equivariant Seiberg–Witten Floer and Heegaard Floer correspondence. For every such YY and s\mathfrak{s}, there are isomorphisms

HF,U(1)SW,+(Y,s)HF+(Y,s),HF,U(1)SW,(Y,s)HF(Y,s);HF^SW(Y,s)HF^(Y,s),HFred,SW(Y,s)HFred,(Y,s).\begin{array}{ccc} HF^{SW,+}_{*,U(1)}(Y,\mathfrak{s}) \cong HF^+_*(Y,\mathfrak{s}), &\qquad & HF^{SW,-}_{*,U(1)}(Y,\mathfrak{s}) \cong HF^-_*(Y,\mathfrak{s});\\[3mm] \widehat{HF}^{SW}_*(Y,\mathfrak{s}) \cong \widehat{HF}_*(Y,\mathfrak{s}), &\qquad & HF^{SW}_{\mathrm{red},*}(Y,\mathfrak{s}) \cong HF_{\mathrm{red},*}(Y,\mathfrak{s}). \end{array}

This conjecture proposes that the equivariant Seiberg–Witten Floer invariants agree with the Heegaard Floer invariants introduced by Ozsváth and Szabó. The preceding result identifies the corresponding infinity versions, but the asserted isomorphisms for the plus, minus, hat, and reduced theories are not resolved in the supplied source context.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Matilde Marcolli and Bai-Ling Wang, “Variants of equivariant Seiberg-Witten Floer homology”, arXiv:math/0211238 (2002).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.