Deninger's exchanged-place Leopoldt conjecture

About 24 years old · traced to

Assume that kk is a CM field. Let Ep(k)E_p(k) be the group of pp-Weil numbers in kk, let

Vk=⨁v∣∞R(1)v,V_k=\bigoplus_{v\mid\infty}{\mathbb R}(1)_v,

where R(1)v{\mathbb R}(1)_v is the purely imaginary subspace at the complex place vv, and let

αp,∞:Ep(k)⟶⨁v∣∞R(1)v/Z(1)v\alpha_{p,\infty}:E_p(k)\longrightarrow\bigoplus_{v\mid\infty}{\mathbb R}(1)_v/{\mathbb Z}(1)_v

be the multivalued complex-logarithm map. If ξ1,…,ξm\xi_1,\ldots,\xi_m is a basis of Ep(k)⊗QE_p(k)\otimes {\mathbb Q}, choose for each ii a lift ηi∈Vk\eta_i\in V_k of (αp,∞⊗1)(ξi)(\alpha_{p,\infty}\otimes 1)(\xi_i). Deninger's exchanged-place Leopoldt conjecture. For every such choice of lifts, the vectors η1,…,ηm\eta_1,\ldots,\eta_m are R{\mathbb R}-linearly independent in VkV_k. This is the strongest formulation proposed for exchanging pp and ∞\infty in Leopoldt's conjecture; the paper gives an equivalent formulation in terms of arguments of conjugates of Weil numbers, but no general proof.

References

Primary source

Christopher Deninger, “Exchanging the places p and infinity in the Leopoldt conjecture”, arXiv:math/0208008 (2002).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.