Generalized configuration-sum fermionic formula

At least 23 years old · documented by

Let η∈P\eta\in\mathcal{P} satisfy η1≤n−1\eta_1\leq n-1. For s,u∈{0,…,N}s,u\in\{0,\dots,N\} and r,v∈{0,…,n−1}r,v\in\{0,\dots,n-1\}, set Λ=(N−s)Λr+sΛr+1\Lambda=(N-s)\Lambda_r+s\Lambda_{r+1} and Λ′=(N−u)Λ0+uΛn−v\Lambda'=(N-u)\Lambda_0+u\Lambda_{n-v}, with ∣η∣Λˉ1−Λˉ+Λˉ′∈Q|\eta|\bar{\Lambda}_1-\bar{\Lambda}+\bar{\Lambda}'\in Q. Define Fη,Λ,Λ′(q)F_{\eta,\Lambda,\Lambda'}(q) by the multiple sum and constraints in the source. Generalized configuration-sum conjecture. Under these conditions,

Xη,Λ,Λ′(q)=Fη,Λ,Λ′(q).X_{\eta,\Lambda,\Lambda'}(q)=F_{\eta,\Lambda,\Lambda'}(q).

The source presents this as a generalization of an earlier theorem and uses it to derive further identities; no proof or resolution is given in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

S. Ole Warnaar, “The Bailey lemma and Kostka polynomials”, arXiv:math/0207030 (2002).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.