Kronheimer–Manolescu's Seiberg–Witten–Ozsváth–Szabó Floer homology conjecture

About 24 years old · traced to

Let YY be a three-manifold with b1(Y)=1b_1(Y)=1 and a nontorsion spincspin^c structure s{\mathfrak{s}}. Let SWF{\text{SWF}} and SWF0{\text{SWF}}_0 be the associated periodic Seiberg–Witten pro-spectra, and let H∗H_*, H∗S1H_*^{S^1}, cH∗S1cH_*^{S^1}, and tH∗S1tH_*^{S^1} denote ordinary, Borel, co-Borel, and Tate homology theories. Kronheimer–Manolescu's conjecture.

HF^n=Hn(SWF0)=Hn(SWF),HFn+=Hn+1S1(SWF0)=Hn+1S1(SWF),\widehat{HF}_n=H_n({\text{SWF}}_0)=H_n({\text{SWF}}),\qquad HF^+_n=H^{S^1}_{n+1}({\text{SWF}}_0)=H^{S^1}_{n+1}({\text{SWF}}), HFn−=cHn+2S1(SWF0),HFn∞=tHnS1(SWF0).HF^-_n=cH^{S^1}_{n+2}({\text{SWF}}_0),\qquad HF^{\infty}_n=tH^{S^1}_n({\text{SWF}}_0).

The same should hold for manifolds with b1(Y)=0b_1(Y)=0 after replacing SWF0{\text{SWF}}_0 by SWF{\text{SWF}}. This conjecture predicts explicit identifications between the Ozsváth–Szabó and Seiberg–Witten Floer theories; the paper presents them as expected relationships rather than proving them.

References

Primary source

Peter B. Kronheimer and Ciprian Manolescu, “Periodic Floer pro-spectra from the Seiberg-Witten equations”, arXiv:math/0203243 (2014).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.