Temperley–Lieb relations for derived cap and cup functors

About 26 years old · traced to

For integers nn and kk, let Db(Ok,n−k)D^b(\mathcal O_{k,n-k}) be the bounded derived category of the relevant parabolic category, and define functors

∩i,n:Db(Ok,n−k)⟶Db(Ok−1,n−k−1),\cap_{i,n}:D^b(\mathcal O_{k,n-k})\longrightarrow D^b(\mathcal O_{k-1,n-k-1}), ∪i,n:Db(Ok,n−k)⟶Db(Ok+1,n+1−k)\cup_{i,n}:D^b(\mathcal O_{k,n-k})\longrightarrow D^b(\mathcal O_{k+1,n+1-k})

by ∩i,n=RΞn,i∘RΓi[1]\cap_{i,n}=\mathcal R\Xi_{n,i}\circ\mathcal R\Gamma_i[1] and ∪i,n=εi∘RΠn,i\cup_{i,n}=\varepsilon_i\circ\mathcal R\Pi_{n,i}. Derived Temperley–Lieb relations conjecture. The defining relations of the Temperley–Lieb category, relations (1)–(6) in the source, should hold as natural equivalences for these functors. The first two equivalences follow from results in the paper, while the last relation is identified as ∩i,n+2∘∪i,n≅Id[1]⊕Id[−1]\cap_{i,n+2}\circ\cup_{i,n}\cong Id[1]\oplus Id[-1]; the remaining relations are not proved there.

References

Primary source

Joseph Bernstein, Igor Frenkel and Mikhail Khovanov, “A categorification of the Temperley-Lieb algebra and Schur quotients of U(sl(2)) via projective and Zuckerman functors”, arXiv:math/0002087 (2000).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.