Pidstrigach–Tyurin reduction formula for PU(2) monopoles

About 29 years old · traced to

Let XX be a four-manifold, let EE be a rank-two bundle, and let z∈A(X)z\in\mathbb A(X). Let nan_a, dad_a, Red⁡‾(W,E)\overline{\operatorname{Red}}(W,E), V‾(z)\overline V(z), W‾(xna−1)\overline W(x^{n_a-1}), and LW,E−ℓ,L1\mathbf L_{W,E_{-\ell},L_1} denote the quantities associated in the source to the PU⁡(2)\operatorname{PU}(2) monopole compactification, its reducible strata, geometric representatives, and links. Pidstrigach–Tyurin reduction formula.

2na−1DXc1(E)(z)=∑L1∈Red⁡‾(W,E)V‾(z)∩W‾(xna−1)∩LW,E−ℓ,L1,deg⁡z=2da,2^{n_a-1}D_X^{c_1(E)}(z)=\sum_{L_1\in\overline{\operatorname{Red}}(W,E)}\overline V(z)\cap\overline W(x^{n_a-1})\cap\mathbf L_{W,E_{-\ell},L_1},\qquad \deg z=2d_a,

and

0=∑L1∈Red⁡‾(W,E)V‾(z)∩W‾(xna−1)∩LW,E−ℓ,L1,deg⁡z>2da.0=\sum_{L_1\in\overline{\operatorname{Red}}(W,E)}\overline V(z)\cap\overline W(x^{n_a-1})\cap\mathbf L_{W,E_{-\ell},L_1},\qquad \deg z>2d_a.

Here ℓ\ell is determined by the reduction E−ℓ=L1⊕((det⁡E)⊗L1)E_{-\ell}=L_1\oplus((\det E)\otimes L_1), with det⁡E−ℓ=det⁡E\det E_{-\ell}=\det E and c2(E−ℓ)=c2(E)−ℓc_2(E_{-\ell})=c_2(E)-\ell. The formula is intended to express Donaldson invariants through pairings over links of Seiberg–Witten moduli spaces; analytical and compactification issues make the general assertion open.

References

Primary source

Paul M. N. Feehan and Thomas G. Leness, “PU(2) monopoles and relations between four-manifold invariants”, arXiv:dg-ga/9709022 (1997).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.