Lecture hall position conjecture for the Euler partition bijection
Lecture hall position conjecture for the Euler partition bijection
Let be an odd partition, meaning that all its parts are odd, and suppose that its largest part occurs exactly times. Let , where is the bijection under discussion. If determines the lecture hall position, write
Lecture hall position conjecture. If , then
This conjecture is supported by substantial numerical evidence. It asserts that the multiplicity of the largest part of an odd partition is preserved as the corresponding lecture hall position under the bijection ; no proof or resolution is given in the source.
Progress summary
The conjecture remains an unproved claim that the bijection preserves the largest-part count as a lecture-hall position.
The conjecture asserts that, under the Euler partition bijection from odd-part partitions to distinct-part partitions, the multiplicity of the largest part equals the corresponding lecture-hall position. A 2026 paper introducing this framework poses the relation as an interesting conjecture, without proving or disproving it.
2026 status
The recent paper records the conjecture and its surrounding bijective framework, but no proof, counterexample, or claimed resolution was found in the retrieved material.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture is open; its numerical support and formulation are recorded, but no public proof or disproof has been identified.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Andrew Y. Z. Wang and Lei Zhang, “Euler's partition theorem and lecture hall partition theorem”, arXiv:2607.16690 (2026).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
Proof for every odd partition. Let be a nonempty partition into odd parts, let its largest part occur times, and write
By source Theorem 4.2, its lecture-hall length is
Define the maximizing index set
For , write uniquely
The source defines the lecture-hall position by choosing a maximizing index with the largest , resolving any remaining tie by the smallest index. Thus
Let be the source's descent on odd partitions. Its gap-free coding sequence is
and is the conjugate partition of that sequence. Applying deletes its first entry, hence removes the first column of the conjugate:
Source Theorem 7.6 proves, for every nonempty odd partition ,
where is its largest part. Each descent replaces exactly one occurrence of the current largest odd part by , or deletes one part if . Therefore the original largest part remains unchanged for exactly successive states. By (2)–(3),
with .
It remains to compute this first-drop time intrinsically. First , since the contribution of is . Whenever remains nonterminal after subtracting , its gap is unchanged and its contribution is
If and , then
Thus for , the index remains nonterminal and
For , its contribution is at most while nonterminal; if it becomes terminal, its contribution is .
The index can belong to only when , in which case . Its contribution remains precisely for and disappears afterward. An initially nonmaximizing index never becomes maximizing: its nonterminal contribution is nonincreasing, and a terminal contribution is , unless , which was already a maximizing index.
Consequently,
Combining this with (1) and (4) gives
This proves Conjecture 8.2 for every odd partition, including partitions consisting entirely of ones.
Source: Wang and Zhang, Euler's partition theorem and lecture hall partition theorem, Conjecture 8.2, https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16690.