Conjecture on congruences for overcubic partition tuples
Let , , and . The overcubic partition tuple function is considered at the indicated arithmetic progressions. Congruence conjecture. For all , , and ,
and
This conjecture proposes further infinite families of arithmetic congruences for overcubic partition tuples, extending the preceding divisibility results; the authors indicate that it may follow from techniques similar to those used in the paper.
References
Primary source
Saikat Maity and Manjil P. Saikia, “Extending Recent Arithmetic Properties of Overcubic Partition Tuples”, arXiv:2607.07270 (2026).
Progress summary
The conjecture is recorded as open, but a complete proof has since been posted and has not been independently checked.
Maity and Saikia formulate two infinite divisibility families as Conjecture 1.5 in their July 2026 paper. The claims concern overcubic partition tuples at indices congruent to and modulo , with moduli depending on .
Known results
- Sellers (2014) and Shivashankar–Naika (2018): related congruences for tuple size .
- Lin (2014), Naika–Shivashankar (2017), and Ray–Barman (2020): related results for .
- Nayaka (2026): related results for .
- Buragohain–Saikia (2024) and Chaćon–Sellers (2026): further arithmetic families, but not these two conjectured families.
Posted attempt
A complete proof is claimed: it establishes base congruences for and then lifts them to the stated indices using a generating-function expansion and -adic divisibility estimates. The argument has not been independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): the conjecture was published as open, while a complete proof has been posted but remains unverified, so the problem is not mathematically settled.
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
Write
We prove, for every , , and , that
All power-series computations take place in .
First, Jacobi's identity gives
where
Since no integer congruent to or is represented by ,
We establish the two base congruences
Suppose first that , and let
Because , the term contributes nothing by (1), and has only even exponents,
Indeed, each representation by two positive squares has one odd entry and one entry with odd, and its two orders both contribute sign . Modulo , Frobenius gives
At an odd exponent, the first factor contributes an odd square from ; the term cannot contribute because it would represent as , whereas gives exactly . Therefore
Expanding modulo and using (1) yields
Next suppose , and let
The square residues modulo give
In the last equality, the two -indices are an odd integer and , with odd, while the -index is odd; both orders contribute sign . Also is even because . Hence
The only term in contributing at residue is , so . Moreover,
The term cannot contribute at residue , since it would require two square residues to sum to ; counts exactly the same triples as . Thus
Writing , one has , so all odd-index coefficients of are divisible by . Finally,
Its odd exponents have the form or , neither of which is . Hence
The expansion modulo now gives
proving both assertions of (2).
For the uniform lifting step, put
Since ,
and
For every ,
by . Thus for odd , every coefficient of is divisible by . For even , write . Since and is a square modulo , its odd-index coefficients vanish modulo , and consequently
Thus every term with vanishes modulo at odd indices.
For , (1) and reduce (9) to
Since , the first base congruence in (2) implies divisibility by at , and the second implies divisibility by at . Both conjectured families therefore hold for all admissible .