Monotonicity conjecture for the multifurcating-tree growth constants
Monotonicity conjecture for the multifurcating-tree growth constants
For each integer , let be the constant in the asymptotic growth
of the maximal ranks of at-most--furcating rooted trees with leaves. Monotonicity conjecture. For , the constants decrease strictly with :
The conjecture is motivated by numerical values for small ; the paper establishes the analogous decrease of the strictly -furcating growth constants , but does not establish the corresponding monotonicity for .
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Michael R. Doboli, Alessandra R. P. Maranca and Noah A. Rosenberg, “Extremal ranks of unlabeled multifurcating rooted trees in a bijective encoding by the positive integers”, arXiv:2606.28539 (2026).
Progress summary
The conjecture remains unresolved: the 2026 paper proves related inequalities but not the proposed decrease of the at-most-branching constants.
For each integer , the conjecture asserts that the growth constants for at-most--furcating rooted trees satisfy . It is posed in the 2026 preprint studying these rank-growth constants.
Known results
- The strictly -furcating constants decrease strictly as increases.
- For , the paper proves .
- The paper gives the asymptotic form involving , but neither proves nor supplies a counterexample.
June 2026 preprint
The preprint, published on June 26, 2026, explicitly records the monotonicity of as unresolved. No retrieved source reports a proof, counterexample, verification, or AI-assisted solution.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture is open; monotonicity of and the comparison are settled, but remains unproved.
Sources
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
We prove that for every integer , as asserted in Doboli, Maranca and Rosenberg, Conjecture 4.8.
For fixed , let be the maximal rank of an at-most--furcating rooted tree with leaves, in the encoding used in that paper. Its equation (10) and Theorem 4.7 give
and
The idea is to bound using just the fourth term of this recurrence. The remaining infinite tail is small enough that a coarse comparison of consecutive central binomial coefficients suffices.
1. A uniform bound for the logarithmic tail
Write . Then
For , expansion of the product gives
where has positive coefficients. Indeed, subtraction changes only the linear coefficient, which becomes
Consequently, with all logarithms natural, we may write
where
For every positive integer and every ,
Here the first inequality follows because increases with . Thus for .
Put
Iterating the logarithmic recurrence from and dividing by yields
The limit on the left is exactly the one in the source normalization: . The series converges by the bound on and . Summing the geometric upper bound proves
2. Comparing consecutive parameters for
Let , so . The exact ratio is
For this ratio exceeds , and hence
Since , induction gives
Indeed, for , so the induction step follows from .
Also , so and
The sequence is strictly increasing, because
Using the upper bound , we obtain, for ,
It follows that
For every , the lower bound on gives
In particular ; for example, . Combining the preceding inequalities,
The last inequality uses and the binomial expansion. Dividing by and applying the boxed tail bound proves
3. The two remaining comparisons
The relevant exact values are
Since , we have
Thus the upper tail bounds simplify to and .
For , use and :
For , the inequality gives . Since and ,
All cases are now covered. Exponentiation yields for every integer , proving Conjecture 4.8.