Monotonicity conjecture for the multifurcating-tree growth constants
For each integer , let be the constant in the asymptotic growth
of the maximal ranks of at-most--furcating rooted trees with leaves. Monotonicity conjecture. For , the constants decrease strictly with :
The conjecture is motivated by numerical values for small ; the paper establishes the analogous decrease of the strictly -furcating growth constants , but does not establish the corresponding monotonicity for .
References
Primary source
Michael R. Doboli, Alessandra R. P. Maranca and Noah A. Rosenberg, “Extremal ranks of unlabeled multifurcating rooted trees in a bijective encoding by the positive integers”, arXiv:2606.28539 (2026).
Progress summary
An unverified posted argument claims to prove the conjecture in every dimension, while the original paper proves only related inequalities.
The conjecture asks whether the growth constants for trees allowing at most children per branching point decrease strictly as increases. The 2026 paper by Michael R. Doboli, Alessandra R. P. Maranca, and Noah A. Rosenberg formulates this conjecture but does not prove it.
Known results
- The strictly -furcating constants decrease strictly with .
- For , the at-most- constants satisfy .
- The paper derives the asymptotic growth involving , but leaves unresolved.
Posted attempt
A posted argument claims a complete proof: it derives logarithmic bounds from the recurrence for the maximal ranks, compares consecutive parameters for , and checks separately. The argument has not been independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture has a complete posted proof claim but remains unverified; the original paper's results on and are settled, while independent confirmation of is absent.
Sources
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
We prove that for every integer , as asserted in Doboli, Maranca and Rosenberg, Conjecture 4.8.
For fixed , let be the maximal rank of an at-most--furcating rooted tree with leaves, in the encoding used in that paper. Its equation (10) and Theorem 4.7 give
and
The idea is to bound using just the fourth term of this recurrence. The remaining infinite tail is small enough that a coarse comparison of consecutive central binomial coefficients suffices.
1. A uniform bound for the logarithmic tail
Write . Then
For , expansion of the product gives
where has positive coefficients. Indeed, subtraction changes only the linear coefficient, which becomes
Consequently, with all logarithms natural, we may write
where
For every positive integer and every ,
Here the first inequality follows because increases with . Thus for .
Put
Iterating the logarithmic recurrence from and dividing by yields
The limit on the left is exactly the one in the source normalization: . The series converges by the bound on and . Summing the geometric upper bound proves
2. Comparing consecutive parameters for
Let , so . The exact ratio is
For this ratio exceeds , and hence
Since , induction gives
Indeed, for , so the induction step follows from .
Also , so and
The sequence is strictly increasing, because
Using the upper bound , we obtain, for ,
It follows that
For every , the lower bound on gives
In particular ; for example, . Combining the preceding inequalities,
The last inequality uses and the binomial expansion. Dividing by and applying the boxed tail bound proves
3. The two remaining comparisons
The relevant exact values are
Since , we have
Thus the upper tail bounds simplify to and .
For , use and :
For , the inequality gives . Since and ,
All cases are now covered. Exponentiation yields for every integer , proving Conjecture 4.8.