Rank-four principal-minor conjecture for scaling matrices

Let C∈Cd×dC\in\mathbb{C}^{d\times d} be a scaling matrix of rank four. A principal 44-minor is non-vanishing when the corresponding principal submatrix has nonzero determinant. Rank-four principal-minor conjecture. The minimum number of non-vanishing principal 44-minors is

(d−13).\binom{d-1}{3}.

In particular, the corresponding delta-matroid lies in the orbit consisting of the families

Fα={∅}∪([d]2)∪([d]3)∪Kα,α∈[d],\mathcal{F}_\alpha=\{\emptyset\}\cup\binom{[d]}{2}\cup\binom{[d]}{3}\cup\mathcal{K}_\alpha,\qquad \alpha\in[d],

where

Kα={K∈([d]4)∣α∈K}.\mathcal{K}_\alpha=\left\{K\in\binom{[d]}{4}\mid\alpha\in K\right\}.

Computations in the source support the claim in the examined small cases, but the general statement remains open.

References

Primary source

Janike Oldekop, “Euler Stratifications of Second Hypersimplices via Delta-matroids”, arXiv:2606.16482 (2026).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A complete proof has been posted for the conjectured minimum, but it has not been independently verified, while published work confirms only small cases.

The conjecture asserts that every rank-four scaling matrix has at least (d−13)\binom{d-1}{3} non-vanishing principal 44-minors, with a stated equality characterization. It is attributed to Clarke et al. (2024), and the general claim was open in the latest primary source.

Known results

The primary source establishes the conjectured minimum for embeddings associated with second hypersimplices up to order six, but does not claim the general rank-four statement.

Posted attempt

An unverified complete proof reduces the problem to counting bases of a rank-four paving matroid, invokes a theorem of Chayim Lowen giving at least (d−13)\binom{d-1}{3} bases, characterizes equality, and supplies an equality construction for every d≥4d\geq4.

Current status (as of August 2026): Published work verifies only the examined small cases; a complete proof has been posted but not independently verified, so the general conjecture remains unsettled.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

Let CC be a complex symmetric d×dd\times d scaling matrix of rank 44, so Cii=0C_{ii}=0 and Cij≠0C_{ij}\neq0 for i≠ji\neq j. Choose a symmetric rank factorization

C=XQXT,C=XQX^{\mathsf T},

where X∈Cd×4X\in\mathbb C^{d\times4} has full column rank and Q∈C4×4Q\in\mathbb C^{4\times4} is symmetric and invertible. For every four-element subset II,

det⁡C[I,I]=det⁡(Q)det⁡(X[I,:])2.(1)\det C[I,I]=\det(Q)\det(X[I,:])^2. \tag{1}

Hence the nonvanishing principal four-minors are exactly the bases of the rank-four row matroid of XX.

For every triple {i,j,k}\{i,j,k\},

det⁡C[{i,j,k},{i,j,k}]=2CijCikCjk≠0.\det C[\{i,j,k\},\{i,j,k\}] =2C_{ij}C_{ik}C_{jk}\neq0.

Thus every three rows of XX are independent, and the represented matroid is paving.

We use the paving-matroid base theorem proved by Chayim Lowen: a rank-rr paving matroid on dd elements has at least

(d−1r−1)\binom{d-1}{r-1}

bases, with equality exactly for Ur−1,d−1⊕U1,1U_{r-1,d-1}\oplus U_{1,1}. See the proof at https://mathoverflow.net/questions/412516/lower-bounds-for-the-number-of-bases-of-a-paving-matroid.

Applying this theorem with r=4r=4 and using (1) gives at least

(d−13)\binom{d-1}{3}

nonzero principal four-minors. Equality holds exactly when some index α\alpha is a coloop and the remaining d−1d-1 indices form U3,d−1U_{3,d-1}, or equivalently exactly when the nonvanishing principal four-minors are those indexed by four-subsets containing α\alpha.

All principal two- and three-minors are nonzero, all principal one-minors vanish, and every principal minor of order at least five vanishes. Consequently the equality-case delta-matroid is precisely

Fα={∅}∪([d]2)∪([d]3)∪{I∈([d]4):α∈I}.\mathcal F_\alpha =\{\varnothing\}\cup\binom{[d]}2\cup\binom{[d]}3 \cup\{I\in\binom{[d]}4:\alpha\in I\}.

Finally, equality is attained for every d≥4d\geq4. Put m=d−1m=d-1, let

Dij=(i−j)2(1≤i,j≤m),u=D1,C=(DuuT0).D_{ij}=(i-j)^2\quad(1\leq i,j\leq m),\qquad u=D\mathbf1,\qquad C=\begin{pmatrix}D&u\\u^{\mathsf T}&0\end{pmatrix}.

Every off-diagonal entry of CC is strictly positive. Writing t=(1,…,m)Tt=(1,\ldots,m)^{\mathsf T}, we have

D=t∘21T−2ttT+1(t∘2)T,D=t^{\circ2}\mathbf1^{\mathsf T} -2tt^{\mathsf T} +\mathbf1(t^{\circ2})^{\mathsf T},

so rank⁡D≤3\operatorname{rank}D\leq3. Every three-element principal minor equals

2(i−j)2(i−k)2(j−k)2≠0,2(i-j)^2(i-k)^2(j-k)^2\neq0,

and therefore rank⁡D=3\operatorname{rank}D=3. Because u=D1u=D\mathbf1, block congruence gives

C∼diag⁡(D,−1TD1),C\sim\operatorname{diag} \left(D,-\mathbf1^{\mathsf T}D\mathbf1\right),

and 1TD1>0\mathbf1^{\mathsf T}D\mathbf1>0; hence rank⁡C=4\operatorname{rank}C=4. The first mm indices have matroid rank three, every triple among them is independent, and the final index is a coloop. Thus exactly

(d−13)\binom{d-1}{3}

principal four-minors are nonzero. This proves both the sharp bound and its complete equality characterization.