Mazur--Tate's refined exceptional zero conjecture

Let p>2p>2, let qEq_E be the Tate period of the elliptic curve EE, and put

Gp=(Z/pZ)×/1.G_p=\left(\operatorname{\mathbb{Z}}/p\operatorname{\mathbb{Z}}\right)^\times/\langle-1\rangle.

Let AQA\subseteq\operatorname{\mathbb{Q}} be a subring containing all modular symbols [ap]\left[\frac{a}{p}\right] for 0ap10\leq a\leq p-1, together with [01]2ordp(qE)\frac{\left[\frac{0}{1}\right]}{2\operatorname{ord}_p(q_E)} and 1#E(Q)Tor\frac{1}{\#E(\operatorname{\mathbb{Q}})_{\mathrm{Tor}}}. If I(A,Gp)I(A,G_p) denotes the augmentation ideal of A[Gp]A[G_p], then the asserted congruence is an equality in I(A,Gp)/I(A,Gp)2I(A,G_p)/I(A,G_p)^2.

Mazur--Tate's refined exceptional zero conjecture. One has

1ap12[ap]aI(A,Gp)\sum_{1 \leq a \leq \frac{p-1}{2}}\left[\frac{a}{p}\right]a\in I(A,G_p)

and

121ap1[ap]a[01]2ordp(qE)(q~E1)in I(A,Gp)/I(A,Gp)2.\frac{1}{2}\sum_{1 \leq a \leq p-1}\left[\frac{a}{p}\right]a \equiv \frac{\left[\frac{0}{1}\right]}{2\operatorname{ord}_p(q_E)}(\widetilde q_E-1)\quad\text{in }I(A,G_p)/I(A,G_p)^2.

Here q~E\widetilde q_E is the image of the Tate period in the relevant group-ring construction.

This is the refined form of the exceptional-zero conjecture relating modular symbols to the Tate period through the augmentation quotient. The source explains that the factor DD used in the equivalent product formulation clears possible denominators; the conjecture is presented as open here, although it is attributed to Mazur and Tate and has partial results due to de Shalit.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Daniel Barrera Salazar and Juan-Pablo Llerena-Córdova, “On periods of Elliptic curves”, arXiv:2606.02254 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.