Mazur--Tate's refined exceptional zero conjecture

Let p>2p>2, let qEq_E be the Tate period of the elliptic curve EE, and put

Gp=(Z⁡/pZ⁡)×/⟨−1⟩.G_p=\left(\operatorname{\mathbb{Z}}/p\operatorname{\mathbb{Z}}\right)^\times/\langle-1\rangle.

Let A⊆Q⁡A\subseteq\operatorname{\mathbb{Q}} be a subring containing all modular symbols [ap]\left[\frac{a}{p}\right] for 0≤a≤p−10\leq a\leq p-1, together with [01]2ord⁡p(qE)\frac{\left[\frac{0}{1}\right]}{2\operatorname{ord}_p(q_E)} and 1#E(Q⁡)Tor\frac{1}{\#E(\operatorname{\mathbb{Q}})_{\mathrm{Tor}}}. If I(A,Gp)I(A,G_p) denotes the augmentation ideal of A[Gp]A[G_p], then the asserted congruence is an equality in I(A,Gp)/I(A,Gp)2I(A,G_p)/I(A,G_p)^2.

Mazur--Tate's refined exceptional zero conjecture. One has

∑1≤a≤p−12[ap]a∈I(A,Gp)\sum_{1 \leq a \leq \frac{p-1}{2}}\left[\frac{a}{p}\right]a\in I(A,G_p)

and

12∑1≤a≤p−1[ap]a≡[01]2ord⁡p(qE)(q~E−1)in I(A,Gp)/I(A,Gp)2.\frac{1}{2}\sum_{1 \leq a \leq p-1}\left[\frac{a}{p}\right]a \equiv \frac{\left[\frac{0}{1}\right]}{2\operatorname{ord}_p(q_E)}(\widetilde q_E-1)\quad\text{in }I(A,G_p)/I(A,G_p)^2.

Here q~E\widetilde q_E is the image of the Tate period in the relevant group-ring construction.

This is the refined form of the exceptional-zero conjecture relating modular symbols to the Tate period through the augmentation quotient. The source explains that the factor DD used in the equivalent product formulation clears possible denominators; the conjecture is presented as open here, although it is attributed to Mazur and Tate and has partial results due to de Shalit.

References

Primary source

Daniel Barrera Salazar and Juan-Pablo Llerena-Córdova, “On periods of Elliptic curves”, arXiv:2606.02254 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.