Uniqueness of the -primitive decomposition for fixed square-free part
Let be square-free, and let be the set of -primitives with square-free part . A natural number has a -primitive decomposition if it can be written as with and -primitive. Fixed-square-free-part uniqueness conjecture. If , then every non-square with square-free part admits a unique -primitive decomposition. The conjecture refines a uniqueness question that is false in general: the paper gives as the smallest counterexample, while the classification of integers with multiple decompositions remains open.
References
Primary source
Victor N. Schvöllner, “The Δ property: a bridge between split graphs and Number Theory”, arXiv:2605.25264 (2026).
Progress summary
A reader-posted complete proof claims the conjecture follows immediately from the uniqueness of the primitive with a given square-free part, but nobody has independently checked it.
The conjecture asserts that fixing a square-free part and requiring exactly one primitive representative forces every nonsquare with that part to have one decomposition. The source paper also records that unrestricted uniqueness fails, with the example .
Posted attempt
A reader-posted argument claims a complete proof: square-free parts are unchanged by multiplying by squares, so two decompositions would yield two members of ; if , their primitive factors and then their square factors coincide. It also claims the nonsquare hypothesis is unnecessary and gives a converse construction when has multiple elements. The argument has not been independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): the conjecture has an unverified complete-proof claim, but no independent verification is recorded; absent that verification, its mathematical status remains open.
Sources
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
Complete proof. For a positive integer , let
denote its square-free part. For every positive integer ,
Proposition 3.2 of the source establishes that every admits a decomposition , where and is -primitive. Equivalently, repeatedly remove a nontrivial square factor whenever its quotient remains in . The positive quotients strictly decrease, so the process terminates at a primitive quotient.
Fix a square-free with , and suppose has square-free part . If
are primitive decompositions, square-free-part invariance gives
Thus . Since is a singleton, ; consequently , and positivity gives . The decomposition therefore exists and is unique. The nonsquare assumption is unnecessary.
More precisely, writing , its primitive decompositions are in bijection with
via and . Conversely, if contains distinct , then
has two distinct primitive decompositions, and every square multiple of does as well. For , all these examples are nonsquares.