The misspecified Cramér–Rao bound conjecture

Let the assumed probability density function be f(x;θ)f(\mathbf{x};\boldsymbol{\theta}), satisfying Conditions 1–4, and let θ^(x)\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}}(\mathbf{x}) be any (locally) misspecified unbiased estimator as defined in Definition 1. Let θ0\boldsymbol{\theta}_*^0 denote the pseudo-true parameter. Define the mean-square error at θ0\boldsymbol{\theta}_*^0 by

MSE(θ^(x),θ0)=Ep[(θ^(x)θ0)(θ^(x)θ0)T].\operatorname{MSE}\bigl(\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}}(\mathbf{x}),\boldsymbol{\theta}_*^0\bigr)=\mathbb{E}_p\left[(\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}}(\mathbf{x})-\boldsymbol{\theta}_*^0)(\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}}(\mathbf{x})-\boldsymbol{\theta}_*^0)^T\right].

Misspecified Cramér–Rao bound conjecture. The mean-square error satisfies

MSE(θ^(x),θ0)MCRB(θ0),\operatorname{MSE}\bigl(\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}}(\mathbf{x}),\boldsymbol{\theta}_*^0\bigr)\succeq \operatorname{MCRB}(\boldsymbol{\theta}_*^0),

where the misspecified Cramér–Rao bound is defined in the source's equation (16). This is presented as a common belief concerning the use of the MCRB as a performance bound under model misspecification; the supplied text does not establish whether the claim is proved or disproved.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Malaak Khatib, Nadav Harel, Joseph Tabrikian and Tirza Routtenberg, “Revisiting the Misspecified Cramér-Rao Bound”, arXiv:2605.20739 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.