Beilinson–Soulé vanishing conjecture in weight zero

About 20 years old · traced to

Let FF be a field, and let K2q(q)(F)K^{(q)}_{2q}(F) and CH⁡q(Spec⁡F,2q)\operatorname{CH}^q(\operatorname{Spec}F,2q) have the meanings used in the Beilinson–Soulé vanishing conjecture. Beilinson–Soulé vanishing conjecture. For q>0q>0,

K2q(q)(F)≃CH⁡q(Spec⁡F,2q)=0.K^{(q)}_{2q}(F)\simeq \operatorname{CH}^q(\operatorname{Spec}F,2q)=0.

This is the special case p=0p=0 of the preceding Beilinson–Soulé vanishing conjecture and is assumed in the paper's argument; no resolution status is supplied.

References

Primary source

Kenichiro Kimura, “On a relation of a conjecture of Goncharov to the co-Lie algebra of Bloch-Kriz mixed Tate motives”, arXiv:2604.17671 (2026).

Additional references

5 papers in this index state this conjecture (2006–2026). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2110.12264, arXiv:0903.1705, arXiv:math/0607272, arXiv:math/0605702.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.