Betti moduli embedding conjecture for all microsheaves on the affine Springer fiber

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let B∨,+B^{\vee,+} and B∨,−B^{\vee,-} be opposite Borel subgroups of G∨G^{\vee} with B∨,+∩B∨,−=T∨B^{\vee,+}\cap B^{\vee,-}=T^{\vee}. Set W=B∨,−B∨,+⊂G∨\mathcal{W}=B^{\vee,-}B^{\vee,+}\subset G^{\vee}, let W0=W∩U∨\mathcal{W}_0=\mathcal{W}\cap\mathcal{U}^{\vee}, and let W~0\widetilde{\mathcal{W}}_0 be the restriction of the Springer resolution U∨~\widetilde{\mathcal{U}^{\vee}} to W0\mathcal{W}_0. The torus T∨T^{\vee} acts by conjugation. Betti moduli embedding conjecture. There is a full embedding

μSh⁡Fl⁡ψ(Mψ)↪QCoh⁡T∨(W~0)\mu\operatorname{Sh}_{\operatorname{Fl}_\psi}(\mathcal{M}_\psi)\hookrightarrow \operatorname{QCoh}^{T^{\vee}}(\widetilde{\mathcal{W}}_0)

extending the equivalence in Theorem DψD_\psi--coherent in the stated sense: the Kirillov category is the full subcategory supplied by Theorem mic, while the coherent category is identified with the full subcategory supported on B∨↪W~0\mathcal{B}^{\vee}\hookrightarrow\widetilde{\mathcal{W}}_0, the fiber over 1∈W01\in\mathcal{W}_0. Moreover, this embedding intertwines the natural actions of X∗(T)\mathbb{X}_*(T) on both sides. This would extend the known description of the relevant subcategory of microsheaves to all microsheaves and relate them to coherent sheaves on a Betti moduli space for G∨G^{\vee}; the source presents it as a further direction and gives no resolution.

References

Primary source

Roman Bezrukavnikov, Pablo Boixeda Alvarez, Michael McBreen and Zhiwei Yun, “Affine Springer fiber and the small quantum group”, arXiv:2604.11966 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.