Realization and arithmetic compatibility conjecture for rank 2 hypergeometric motives

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let KK be the base field of the hypergeometric data α,β\boldsymbol\alpha,\boldsymbol\beta. For a parameter zz, write H(α,β∣z)\mathcal H(\boldsymbol\alpha,\boldsymbol\beta\mid z) for the associated hypergeometric motive, and let SgS_g denote the set of primes of good reduction. For a finite extension LL of KK, consider a generic specialization z∈Lz\in L.

Realization and compatibility conjecture. The following assertions hold:

  1. The motive H(α,β∣z)\mathcal H(\boldsymbol\alpha,\boldsymbol\beta\mid z) has a realization H(z)\mathcal H(z) over K(z)K(z).
  2. The representation of the motive restricted to Gal⁡(K(z)‾/K‾(z))\operatorname{Gal}(\overline{K(z)}/\overline K(z)) is isomorphic to the geometric Galois representation.
  3. The specialization H(z)\mathcal H(z) for generic z∈Lz\in L has coefficient field KK.
  4. The primes p∈Sg\mathfrak p\in S_g of LL are of good reduction, and the trace of Frobenius on H(z)\mathcal H(z) is given by the finite hypergeometric sum Hp(α,β∣z)H_{\mathfrak p}(\boldsymbol\alpha,\boldsymbol\beta\mid z).

These assertions are expected from the conjugation behavior of hypergeometric motives and are supported by numerical evidence. They formulate the conjectural realization, compatibility, coefficient-field, and Frobenius-trace properties for the rank-22 hypergeometric motives considered in the paper.

References

Primary source

Franco Golfieri Madriaga, Ariel Pacetti and Fernando Rodriguez Villegas, “On rank 2 hypergeometric motives”, arXiv:2603.17978 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.