Hook-length bias conjecture for 5-core partitions
Hook-length bias conjecture for 5-core partitions
Let count the hooks of length in all the -core partitions of . Hook-length bias conjecture for 5-core partitions. For all , one has
The inequalities are motivated by the established analogous hook-length biases for 2-, 3-, and 4-core partitions. They are based on numerical exploration, and no proof or disproof is given in the supplied text.
Progress summary
The proposed ordering of hook counts for partitions avoiding multiples of five has neither been proved nor disproved.
The conjecture asserts that, for every size , hooks of length outnumber hooks of length , which in turn outnumber hooks of length , when summed over all -core partitions. It appears in a March 2026 preprint by Nayandeep Deka Baruah, Hirakjyoti Das, Pankaj Jyoti Mahanta, and Manjil P. Saikia, based on numerical evidence.
Known results
- The same preprint proves the analogous chain for all .
- It proves for all .
March 2026 preprint
The revised preprint, submitted March 12, 2026, still presents the -core statement only as Conjecture 1.5 and reports no proof, disproof, counterexample, or claimed resolution.
Current status (as of August 2026): The -core hook-length inequalities remain open, with no verified proof or disproof found.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Nayandeep Deka Baruah, Hirakjyoti Das, Pankaj Jyoti Mahanta and Manjil P. Saikia, “Hook Length Biases in t-Core Partitions”, arXiv:2603.10140 (2026).
Additional references
4 papers in this index state this conjecture (2023–2026). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2412.00973, arXiv:2404.07485, arXiv:2303.16512.
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
Both proposed hook-length inequalities for 5-core partitions are false
Problem. MathDB #373536, the hook-length bias conjecture for 5-core partitions.
Primary source. Nayandeep Deka Baruah, Hirakjyoti Das, Pankaj Jyoti Mahanta, and Manjil P. Saikia, Hook Length Biases in -Core Partitions, arXiv:2603.10140v2, Conjecture 1.5.
For a partition , let denote its number of cells with hook length . The source defines
Here a partition is a -core precisely when none of its hook lengths is divisible by . Conjecture 1.5 asserts, for every , that
We show that both inequalities fail separately. Their sharp first counterexamples are
Thus
The first inequality holds at every smaller , while the second holds at every smaller .
1. A complete finite parametrization of 5-core partitions
Write the beta set of a partition as
The empty partition has beta set consisting of all negative integers. The usual bead-removal criterion says that is a -core if and only if
Consequently, on each residue class , its occupied positions form a lower ray. There are unique integers such that
Because the beta set comes from a partition, the number of beads moved above the empty-partition boundary equals the number of holes created below it. Equivalently,
Conversely, every integer vector satisfying (8) defines a balanced beta set by (7), hence exactly one -core partition.
Its size is
For completeness, moving the runner boundary from to changes the beta-set energy by
where the same polynomial also applies when . Summing over runners and using (8) gives (9).
Completing squares turns the size condition into the particularly useful finite enumeration criterion
Thus every -core partition of is represented once and only once by a vector in the explicit finite set
In particular, no unbounded search or presumed cutoff is involved:
2. Counting actual hooks from the balanced beta set
A cell of hook length corresponds to an occupied beta position for which is unoccupied. Fix its runner , put
and write . By (7), the position is occupied exactly when , whereas
is unoccupied exactly when . The number of such integers is therefore
Summing independently over the five runners gives the exact hook-count formula
Combining (11) and (14) now gives a finite, completely explicit expression for every quantity in the conjecture:
This formula counts the individual Young-diagram cells from the source; it does not replace hooks by distinct part sizes, residue classes, or a different partition statistic.
3. First inequality: the smallest counterexample is 93
For , equation (10) becomes
There are exactly solutions satisfying (8). The following table groups them by the first runner coordinate ; the final three columns are the sums of their actual -, -, and -hook counts from (14).
| Number of -cores | -hooks | -hooks | -hooks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total |
Hence
The second inequality does hold at this size, since .
4. Second inequality: the smallest counterexample is 793
For , the corresponding complete enumeration condition is
This time there are exactly -core partitions. Grouping them by the same runner coordinate gives the complete certificate below.
| Number of -cores | -hooks | -hooks | -hooks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total |
Therefore
At this size, the other inequality holds, since . The failures are therefore genuinely independent: neither adjacent comparison in the proposed chain is valid for all .
5. Completeness, minimality, and independent cross-checks
To verify minimality, enumerate all balanced vectors satisfying
The finite bound (12) makes this exhaustive. Evaluate (14) for each vector and group by its exact size (9). The resulting complete coefficient lists satisfy
As an independent completeness check, the number of reconstructed -cores at every size agrees with the classical generating function already cited in the primary source:
Moreover, at both counterexample sizes the beta sets were converted back into all and actual Young diagrams. Their individual cell hooks were counted directly, and every diagram was independently checked to have no hook divisible by . Direct enumeration of every ordinary partition through size provides another independent verification of both the core criterion and formula (14).
Thus the first failure of the first inequality occurs at , the first failure of the second occurs at , and Conjecture 1.5 is false in both of its proposed comparisons.