Quasi-periodic Poincaré–Bertrand formula

Let γ0\gamma_0 denote the portion of γ\gamma lying in the strip [−d/2,d/2)×R[-d/2,d/2) \times \mathbb{R} and define

Hξ[σ](x)=∫γ0∂τ(y)Gξ,L(x−y)σ(y) dy,Dξ[σ](x)=∫γ0∂n(y)Gξ,L(x−y)σ(y) dy.\mathcal{H}_\xi[\sigma](\boldsymbol{x}) = \int_{\gamma_0} \partial_{\boldsymbol \tau(\boldsymbol{y})} G_{\xi,L}(\boldsymbol{x}-\boldsymbol{y})\sigma(\boldsymbol{y})\,\mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{y}, \qquad \mathcal{D}_\xi[\sigma](\boldsymbol{x}) = \int_{\gamma_0} \partial_{\boldsymbol n(\boldsymbol{y})} G_{\xi,L}(\boldsymbol{x}-\boldsymbol{y})\sigma(\boldsymbol{y})\,\mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{y}.

These are the quasi-periodic Hilbert transform and Laplace double-layer potential, respectively. If σ\sigma is Hölder continuous and quasi-periodic, then Quasi-periodic Poincaré–Bertrand formula.

14Hξ2[σ]=−σ4+Dξ2[σ].\frac14\mathcal{H}_\xi^2[\sigma] = -\frac{\sigma}{4} + \mathcal{D}_\xi^2[\sigma].

This conjecture proposes the quasi-periodic analogue of the standard Poincaré–Bertrand identity, which is used to simplify boundary integral formulations for free-space flexural scattering problems. Its validity is needed for the subsequent derivation of the quasi-periodic integral equations and is not established in the source.

References

Primary source

Fruzsina Agocs, Tristan Goodwill, Jeremy G. Hoskins and Peter Nekrasov, “Integral equations for flexural scattering problems with periodic boundaries”, arXiv:2603.00366 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.