Quasi-periodic Poincaré–Bertrand formula

Let γ0\gamma_0 denote the portion of γ\gamma lying in the strip [d/2,d/2)×R[-d/2,d/2) \times \mathbb{R} and define

Hξ[σ](x)=γ0τ(y)Gξ,L(xy)σ(y)dy,Dξ[σ](x)=γ0n(y)Gξ,L(xy)σ(y)dy.\mathcal{H}_\xi[\sigma](\boldsymbol{x}) = \int_{\gamma_0} \partial_{\boldsymbol \tau(\boldsymbol{y})} G_{\xi,L}(\boldsymbol{x}-\boldsymbol{y})\sigma(\boldsymbol{y})\,\mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{y}, \qquad \mathcal{D}_\xi[\sigma](\boldsymbol{x}) = \int_{\gamma_0} \partial_{\boldsymbol n(\boldsymbol{y})} G_{\xi,L}(\boldsymbol{x}-\boldsymbol{y})\sigma(\boldsymbol{y})\,\mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{y}.

These are the quasi-periodic Hilbert transform and Laplace double-layer potential, respectively. If σ\sigma is Hölder continuous and quasi-periodic, then Quasi-periodic Poincaré–Bertrand formula.

14Hξ2[σ]=σ4+Dξ2[σ].\frac14\mathcal{H}_\xi^2[\sigma] = -\frac{\sigma}{4} + \mathcal{D}_\xi^2[\sigma].

This conjecture proposes the quasi-periodic analogue of the standard Poincaré–Bertrand identity, which is used to simplify boundary integral formulations for free-space flexural scattering problems. Its validity is needed for the subsequent derivation of the quasi-periodic integral equations and is not established in the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Fruzsina Agocs, Tristan Goodwill, Jeremy G. Hoskins and Peter Nekrasov, “Integral equations for flexural scattering problems with periodic boundaries”, arXiv:2603.00366 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.