The predicted splitting of the hyperreal dual Steenrod algebra

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let GG be the group acting in the hyperreal setting, let C2C_2 be its indicated subgroup, and let E2+σE_{2+\sigma} and BBURBBU_{\mathbb R} denote the spaces appearing in the source. Write HZ‾H\underline{\mathbb Z} for the relevant equivariant Eilenberg–Mac Lane algebra and let Ξn\Xi_n denote the quotient object introduced earlier in the paper. The group GG acts on Map⁡C2(G,E2+σ)\operatorname{Map}^{C_2}(G,E_{2+\sigma}) and Map⁡C2(G,BBUR)\operatorname{Map}^{C_2}(G,BBU_{\mathbb R}). Predicted splitting. There should be an equivalence of Map⁡C2(G,E2+σ)\operatorname{Map}^{C_2}(G,E_{2+\sigma})-algebras

HZ‾⊗ΞnHZ‾≃HZ‾⊗Σ+∞Map⁡C2(G,BBUR).H\underline{\mathbb Z}\underset{\Xi_n}{\otimes}H\underline{\mathbb Z}\simeq H\underline{\mathbb Z}\otimes\Sigma^{\infty}_+\operatorname{Map}^{C_2}(G,BBU_{\mathbb R}).

The preceding geometric-fixed-point computation suggests this splitting by identifying the left-hand side with the expected additional copy of BBURBBU_{\mathbb R}; establishing the asserted equivalence requires proving that this geometric-fixed-point evidence lifts to an equivalence of algebras.

References

Primary source

Michael A. Hill and Michael J. Hopkins, “On the hyperreal dual Steenrod algebra”, arXiv:2602.11010 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.