The lattice-symmetry rigidity conjecture for proper holomorphic maps between balls

Let f:B⁡m→B⁡Mf: \operatorname{\mathbb{B}}^m \rightarrow \operatorname{\mathbb{B}}^M be a proper holomorphic map that extends to a Hölder-continuous map B⁡m‾→B⁡M‾\overline{\operatorname{\mathbb{B}}^m} \rightarrow \overline{\operatorname{\mathbb{B}}^M}. Let G⁡f\operatorname{\mathsf{G}}_f be the symmetry group of ff, and consider the natural projection G⁡f→Aut⁡(B⁡m)\operatorname{\mathsf{G}}_f \rightarrow \operatorname{\mathsf{Aut}}(\operatorname{\mathbb{B}}^m). Lattice-symmetry rigidity conjecture. If the image of this projection contains a uniform lattice, then there exist ϕ1∈Aut⁡(B⁡m)\phi_1 \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Aut}}(\operatorname{\mathbb{B}}^m) and ϕ2∈Aut⁡(B⁡M)\phi_2 \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Aut}}(\operatorname{\mathbb{B}}^M) such that

ϕ2∘f∘ϕ1(z)=(z,0)\phi_2 \circ f \circ \phi_1(z) = (z,0)

for all z∈B⁡mz \in \operatorname{\mathbb{B}}^m. This is presented as an equivalent restatement of the lattice-preservation conjecture, whose special case M≤2m−1M \leq 2m-1 is known; the general statement remains open.

References

Primary source

Kyle Huang, Jinwoo Park, Aleksander Skenderi, Jaan Amla Srimurthy, Rou Wen and Andrew Zimmer, “Rigidity of proper holomorphic maps between balls with Hölder boundary regularity”, arXiv:2602.05795 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.