Catalan-type formula for transitive partitions of the complete directed graph

For each integer n≥3n\ge 3, let K⃗n\vec K_n denote the complete directed graph on nn vertices, and let {K⃗nn−2}\genfrac{\{} {\}}{0pt}1{\vec K_n}{n-2} denote the number of admissible partitions into n−2n-2 blocks arising from the transitivity functor for K⃗n\vec K_n. Transitivity enumeration conjecture.

{K⃗nn−2}=(n−2)(2n−3n)+(2(n−2)n).\genfrac{\{} {\}}{0pt}1{\vec K_n}{n-2}=(n-2)\binom{2n-3}{n}+\binom{2(n-2)}{n}.

This gives the next coefficient in the polynomial enumeration of transitive arrays; the supplied context does not state whether the formula has been proved or disproved.

References

Primary source

Arkady Berenstein, Jacob Greenstein and Jian-Rong Li, “Monomial bialgebras”, arXiv:2602.02342 (2026).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A reader has posted a complete proof of the formula, but nobody has independently checked it.

The conjecture gives the next count for transitive partitions of the acyclic tournament on nn ordered vertices; no proposer or original date is identified in the retrieved sources.

Known results

  • The maximal case, with n−1n-1 blocks, is counted by the Catalan number Cn−1C_{n-1} (Adin, Berenstein, Greenstein, Li, Marmor, and Roichman, 2025).

Posted attempt

A posted argument claims a complete proof: it decomposes the n−2n-2-block partitions by cuts and derives tn=(n−12)Cn−1−(n−2)Cn−2t_n=\binom{n-1}{2}C_{n-1}-(n-2)C_{n-2}, then converts this to the conjectured formula. The argument has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The n−1n-1-block Catalan case is established, while the stated n−2n-2-block formula has a complete-proof claim but remains unverified.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

We prove Conjecture 3.13. Here the directed graph is the acyclic tournament with edge set In={(i,j):1≤i<j≤n}I_n=\{(i,j):1\leq i<j\leq n\}. Thus we count partitions of InI_n into n−2n-2 nonempty blocks such that, writing c(i,j)c(i,j) for the block containing (i,j)(i,j),

c(i,k)∈{c(i,j),c(j,k)}(i<j<k).c(i,k)\in\{c(i,j),c(j,k)\} \qquad(i<j<k).

Block names are only notation: the blocks are not separately labeled. Let tnt_n be this count, and let Cm=1m+1(2mm)C_m=\frac{1}{m+1}\binom{2m}{m} be the Catalan numbers. We will show

tn=(n−12)Cn−1−(n−2)Cn−2.(1)\begin{aligned} t_n&=\binom{n-1}{2}C_{n-1}\\ &\quad-(n-2)C_{n-2}. \end{aligned} \tag{1}

The maximal, n−1n-1-block case is the Catalan enumeration of Adin, Berenstein, Greenstein, Li, Marmor and Roichman, Theorem 2.17. We include the needed decomposition and then analyze the case with one fewer block.

Consecutive edges and cuts

Repeated use of transitivity gives

c(i,j)∈{c(i,i+1),…,c(j−1,j)}.(2)c(i,j)\in\{c(i,i+1),\ldots,c(j-1,j)\}. \tag{2}

In particular, every block occurs on the consecutive-edge path. A coloring with n−1n-1 blocks has distinct colors on that path; one with n−2n-2 blocks has exactly one color occurring twice there, with every other path color occurring once.

Call r∈{1,…,n−1}r\in\{1,\ldots,n-1\} a cut if all edges (i,j)(i,j) with i≤r<ji\leq r<j have the same color. That color must be c(1,n)c(1,n).

If c(1,n)=ac(1,n)=a occurs on the consecutive-edge path only at rr, then rr is a cut. Indeed, for j>rj>r, transitivity and (2) force c(1,j)=ac(1,j)=a: the other part of a split at jj cannot contain aa. For i≤ri\leq r, splitting (1,j)(1,j) at ii similarly forces c(i,j)=ac(i,j)=a. The endpoint cases i=1i=1 or j=nj=n are immediate.

Let MnM_n count the maximal, n−1n-1-block partitions, with M1=1M_1=1 for the empty edge set. Such a partition has a unique cut. Its two restrictions are maximal, their color sets are disjoint, and the cut color is new. Conversely, these data always give a transitive partition. Hence

M1=1,Mn=∑r=1n−1MrMn−r=Cn−1.M_1=1,\qquad M_n=\sum_{r=1}^{n-1}M_rM_{n-r}=C_{n-1}.

Writing M(z)=∑n≥1MnznM(z)=\sum_{n\geq1}M_nz^n, we therefore have

M=z+M2.(3)M=z+M^2. \tag{3}

Partitions without a cut

We now classify an n−2n-2-block partition having no cut. Its outer color a=c(1,n)a=c(1,n) must occur twice on the path, say at positions p<qp<q. Put

A=[1,p],B=[p+1,q],D=[q+1,n].A=[1,p],\qquad B=[p+1,q],\qquad D=[q+1,n].

All edges from AA to DD have color aa, by the same splitting argument used above. No edge inside any of A,B,DA,B,D has color aa, by (2).

Let LL consist of vertices of BB having some non-aa edge to AA, and let RR consist of vertices of BB having some non-aa edge to DD. Both are nonempty, since otherwise pp or qq would be a cut. They are disjoint: a vertex in both would give an AA--BB--DD triangle whose outer edge has color aa and whose two other edges do not. Consequently, every AA--RR edge and every LL--DD edge has color aa.

Every vertex of RR precedes every vertex of LL. Otherwise, take ℓ<r\ell<r with ℓ∈L\ell\in L, r∈Rr\in R, and i∈Ai\in A with c(i,ℓ)≠ac(i,\ell)\ne a. Since c(i,r)=ac(i,r)=a, transitivity forces c(ℓ,r)=ac(\ell,r)=a, impossible inside BB.

For r∈Rr\in R and ℓ∈L\ell\in L, choose i∈Ai\in A and j∈Dj\in D witnessing their non-aa contacts. Applying transitivity to i<r<ℓi<r<\ell and r<ℓ<jr<\ell<j yields

c(i,ℓ)=c(r,ℓ)=c(r,j).(4)c(i,\ell)=c(r,\ell)=c(r,j). \tag{4}

Fixing one vertex in each of R,LR,L and then varying the choices shows that all non-aa contacts in question, and all RR--LL edges, have one common color b≠ab\ne a. By (2), bb occurs on the path inside BB, where every path color occurs only once.

There are no remaining vertices in BB. To see this, let v∈B∖(R∪L)v\in B\setminus(R\cup L). Its edges to AA and DD all have color aa. For any r∈Rr\in R, transitivity with a non-aa contact from rr to DD shows that v<rv<r would force an aa-colored edge inside BB. Thus r<vr<v, and the same triangle gives c(r,v)=bc(r,v)=b. Similarly, v<ℓv<\ell and c(v,ℓ)=bc(v,\ell)=b for every ℓ∈L\ell\in L. All such remaining vertices would therefore lie between RR and LL, with color bb on both consecutive-edge boundaries. This contradicts the uniqueness of bb on the path. Hence BB is the consecutive concatenation of the two nonempty intervals R,LR,L.

Every AA--LL edge has color bb. Indeed, a triangle through a vertex of RR shows that its color is either aa or bb. For a fixed ℓ∈L\ell\in L, two different such colors at vertices of AA would, by transitivity, force an internal edge of AA to have color aa or bb. Neither color occurs on the path inside AA, so this is impossible. Since ℓ\ell has a non-aa contact to AA, all these colors are bb. The same argument gives color bb on every RR--DD edge.

We have obtained four consecutive, nonempty intervals with the following inter-interval colors:

PairColor
A,RA,Raa
A,LA,Lbb
A,DA,Daa
R,LR,Lbb
R,DR,Dbb
L,DL,Daa

Inside each interval the coloring is maximal; these internal color sets are pairwise disjoint and avoid a,ba,b, since all the other consecutive-edge colors are distinct.

Conversely, any four maximal interval colorings with disjoint color sets, joined by this table using two new colors, give a transitive partition with n−2n-2 blocks and no cut. Transitivity is checked on the four triples of distinct intervals; triples meeting fewer intervals are immediate. Every possible cut has crossing edges of both colors a,ba,b. The decomposition is unique: p,qp,q are the positions of the repeated path color, and the boundary between R,LR,L is the position of bb.

Thus the generating function for partitions with no cut is

M(z)4.(5)M(z)^4. \tag{5}

Counting the partitions with cuts

Set t1=t2=0t_1=t_2=0 and T(z)=∑n≥1tnznT(z)=\sum_{n\geq1}t_nz^n. Count pairs consisting of an n−2n-2-block partition and a marked cut. If the two sides have sizes r,sr,s, where r+s=nr+s=n, there are exactly three possibilities:

  • The left restriction has one fewer block than maximal, the right is maximal, and all their colors and the cut color are distinct: trMst_rM_s possibilities.
  • The right restriction has one fewer block than maximal, with the analogous distinctness: MrtsM_rt_s possibilities.
  • Both restrictions are maximal, and exactly one pair among their colors and the cut color is identified. The pair is either one color from each side, or the cut color and one color from either side. This gives
((r−1)(s−1)+(r−1)+(s−1))⋅MrMs=(rs−1)MrMs.\begin{aligned} &\bigl((r-1)(s-1)+(r-1)+(s-1)\bigr)\\ &\qquad\cdot M_rM_s=(rs-1)M_rM_s. \end{aligned}

These cases exhaust the possibilities because the total deficit from n−1n-1 colors is exactly one. All listed identifications preserve transitivity, and they give distinct partitions with the marked cut. Consequently, the generating function for marked cuts is

2MT+(zM′)2−M2.(6)2MT+(zM')^2-M^2. \tag{6}

A partition has at most two cuts: all cuts have color c(1,n)c(1,n), so their consecutive edges have the same color. If there are two cuts, the three intervening intervals are maximal, with disjoint internal colors and one new common color between intervals. Conversely, every such choice has exactly those two cuts. Their generating function is M3M^3.

Therefore, subtracting one extra count for each two-cut partition and adding the no-cut partitions from (5),

(1−2M)T=(zM′)2−M2−M3+M4.(7)\begin{aligned} (1-2M)T&=(zM')^2-M^2\\ &\quad-M^3+M^4. \end{aligned} \tag{7}

Extracting the coefficient

Equation (3) gives

M′=11−2M,M′′=2(1−2M)3.M'=\frac{1}{1-2M},\qquad M''=\frac{2}{(1-2M)^3}.

Substituting these identities and z=M−M2z=M-M^2 into (7), and simplifying, gives

T=z22M′′−z(1+z)M′+(1+z)M.(8)\begin{aligned} T&=\frac{z^2}{2}M''-z(1+z)M'\\ &\quad+(1+z)M. \end{aligned} \tag{8}

All operations are in formal power series; M(0)=0M(0)=0, so the denominator 1−2M1-2M is invertible. Since [zn]M=Cn−1[z^n]M=C_{n-1}, equation (8) gives, for every n≥3n\geq3,

tn=(n(n−1)2−n+1)Cn−1−(n−2)Cn−2=(n−12)Cn−1−(n−2)Cn−2.\begin{aligned} t_n &=\left(\frac{n(n-1)}2-n+1\right)C_{n-1}\\ &\quad-(n-2)C_{n-2}\\ &=\binom{n-1}{2}C_{n-1}-(n-2)C_{n-2}. \end{aligned}

Finally, substituting the factorial formulas for the Catalan numbers yields

tn=(n−2)(2n−3n)+(2n−4n),\boxed{\displaystyle t_n=(n-2)\binom{2n-3}{n}+\binom{2n-4}{n}},

with (mn)=0\binom{m}{n}=0 when m<nm<n. In particular, the boundary case n=3n=3 gives the unique one-block partition. This proves the conjecture.