Catalan-type formula for transitive partitions of the complete directed graph
For each integer , let denote the complete directed graph on vertices, and let denote the number of admissible partitions into blocks arising from the transitivity functor for . Transitivity enumeration conjecture.
This gives the next coefficient in the polynomial enumeration of transitive arrays; the supplied context does not state whether the formula has been proved or disproved.
References
Primary source
Arkady Berenstein, Jacob Greenstein and Jian-Rong Li, “Monomial bialgebras”, arXiv:2602.02342 (2026).
Progress summary
A reader has posted a complete proof of the formula, but nobody has independently checked it.
The conjecture gives the next count for transitive partitions of the acyclic tournament on ordered vertices; no proposer or original date is identified in the retrieved sources.
Known results
- The maximal case, with blocks, is counted by the Catalan number (Adin, Berenstein, Greenstein, Li, Marmor, and Roichman, 2025).
Posted attempt
A posted argument claims a complete proof: it decomposes the -block partitions by cuts and derives , then converts this to the conjectured formula. The argument has not been independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): The -block Catalan case is established, while the stated -block formula has a complete-proof claim but remains unverified.
Sources
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
We prove Conjecture 3.13. Here the directed graph is the acyclic tournament with edge set . Thus we count partitions of into nonempty blocks such that, writing for the block containing ,
Block names are only notation: the blocks are not separately labeled. Let be this count, and let be the Catalan numbers. We will show
The maximal, -block case is the Catalan enumeration of Adin, Berenstein, Greenstein, Li, Marmor and Roichman, Theorem 2.17. We include the needed decomposition and then analyze the case with one fewer block.
Consecutive edges and cuts
Repeated use of transitivity gives
In particular, every block occurs on the consecutive-edge path. A coloring with blocks has distinct colors on that path; one with blocks has exactly one color occurring twice there, with every other path color occurring once.
Call a cut if all edges with have the same color. That color must be .
If occurs on the consecutive-edge path only at , then is a cut. Indeed, for , transitivity and (2) force : the other part of a split at cannot contain . For , splitting at similarly forces . The endpoint cases or are immediate.
Let count the maximal, -block partitions, with for the empty edge set. Such a partition has a unique cut. Its two restrictions are maximal, their color sets are disjoint, and the cut color is new. Conversely, these data always give a transitive partition. Hence
Writing , we therefore have
Partitions without a cut
We now classify an -block partition having no cut. Its outer color must occur twice on the path, say at positions . Put
All edges from to have color , by the same splitting argument used above. No edge inside any of has color , by (2).
Let consist of vertices of having some non- edge to , and let consist of vertices of having some non- edge to . Both are nonempty, since otherwise or would be a cut. They are disjoint: a vertex in both would give an ---- triangle whose outer edge has color and whose two other edges do not. Consequently, every -- edge and every -- edge has color .
Every vertex of precedes every vertex of . Otherwise, take with , , and with . Since , transitivity forces , impossible inside .
For and , choose and witnessing their non- contacts. Applying transitivity to and yields
Fixing one vertex in each of and then varying the choices shows that all non- contacts in question, and all -- edges, have one common color . By (2), occurs on the path inside , where every path color occurs only once.
There are no remaining vertices in . To see this, let . Its edges to and all have color . For any , transitivity with a non- contact from to shows that would force an -colored edge inside . Thus , and the same triangle gives . Similarly, and for every . All such remaining vertices would therefore lie between and , with color on both consecutive-edge boundaries. This contradicts the uniqueness of on the path. Hence is the consecutive concatenation of the two nonempty intervals .
Every -- edge has color . Indeed, a triangle through a vertex of shows that its color is either or . For a fixed , two different such colors at vertices of would, by transitivity, force an internal edge of to have color or . Neither color occurs on the path inside , so this is impossible. Since has a non- contact to , all these colors are . The same argument gives color on every -- edge.
We have obtained four consecutive, nonempty intervals with the following inter-interval colors:
| Pair | Color |
|---|---|
Inside each interval the coloring is maximal; these internal color sets are pairwise disjoint and avoid , since all the other consecutive-edge colors are distinct.
Conversely, any four maximal interval colorings with disjoint color sets, joined by this table using two new colors, give a transitive partition with blocks and no cut. Transitivity is checked on the four triples of distinct intervals; triples meeting fewer intervals are immediate. Every possible cut has crossing edges of both colors . The decomposition is unique: are the positions of the repeated path color, and the boundary between is the position of .
Thus the generating function for partitions with no cut is
Counting the partitions with cuts
Set and . Count pairs consisting of an -block partition and a marked cut. If the two sides have sizes , where , there are exactly three possibilities:
- The left restriction has one fewer block than maximal, the right is maximal, and all their colors and the cut color are distinct: possibilities.
- The right restriction has one fewer block than maximal, with the analogous distinctness: possibilities.
- Both restrictions are maximal, and exactly one pair among their colors and the cut color is identified. The pair is either one color from each side, or the cut color and one color from either side. This gives
These cases exhaust the possibilities because the total deficit from colors is exactly one. All listed identifications preserve transitivity, and they give distinct partitions with the marked cut. Consequently, the generating function for marked cuts is
A partition has at most two cuts: all cuts have color , so their consecutive edges have the same color. If there are two cuts, the three intervening intervals are maximal, with disjoint internal colors and one new common color between intervals. Conversely, every such choice has exactly those two cuts. Their generating function is .
Therefore, subtracting one extra count for each two-cut partition and adding the no-cut partitions from (5),
Extracting the coefficient
Equation (3) gives
Substituting these identities and into (7), and simplifying, gives
All operations are in formal power series; , so the denominator is invertible. Since , equation (8) gives, for every ,
Finally, substituting the factorial formulas for the Catalan numbers yields
with when . In particular, the boundary case gives the unique one-block partition. This proves the conjecture.