Asymptotic uniformity conjecture for the smallest maximum

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let X(1),X(2),…\mathbf{X}^{(1)},\mathbf{X}^{(2)},\ldots be independent and identically distributed dd-dimensional observations with independent Exponential⁡(1)\operatorname{Exponential}(1) coordinates, and let Sd−1\mathcal{S}_{d-1} be the probability simplex. Let σn\boldsymbol{\sigma}_n be the almost surely unique maximum of {X(1),…,X(n)}\{\mathbf{X}^{(1)},\ldots,\mathbf{X}^{(n)}\} with minimum ℓ1\ell^1-norm, and write φn=∥σn∥\varphi_n=\|\boldsymbol{\sigma}_n\|. Asymptotic uniformity conjecture. The random variables φn\varphi_n and φn−1σn\varphi_n^{-1}\boldsymbol{\sigma}_n are asymptotically independent, and

φn−1σn → d  Unif⁡(Sd−1).\varphi_n^{-1}\boldsymbol{\sigma}_n\ \xrightarrow{\ d\ }\ \operatorname{Unif}(\mathcal{S}_{d-1}).

For the largest maximum, the analogous radial and angular variables are independent at finite nn, whereas this fails for the smallest maximum; the conjecture asserts that independence and uniform angularity nevertheless emerge asymptotically.

References

Primary source

James Allen Fill, “A new fine-scale Berry-Esseen-type Gumbel-limit theorem for multivariate maxima”, arXiv:2601.18170 (2026).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A posted argument claims to prove the conjecture through a Poisson-process analysis, but the claim has not been independently verified and the published paper still treats it as open.

James Allen Fill’s 2026 paper records the conjecture that the smallest maximum’s size and direction become independent, with direction tending to uniformity on the simplex.

Known results

  • Fill, Naiman, and Sun (2024) established the leading-order behavior of the smallest maximum’s norm.
  • Fill (2026) proved a sharp Gumbel limit and Berry–Esseen-type bound for the centered and scaled radial variable φn\varphi_n.
  • The same paper states asymptotic independence and uniform angularity as Conjecture 11.2, supported there only heuristically.

Posted attempt

A reader-written argument claims a complete proof for every d≥2d \ge 2, via convergence of a marked Poisson process whose angular marks are uniform and independent of the radial coordinate. The argument has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): the radial limit is proved, while asymptotic independence and uniform angular convergence remain unverified; a complete-proof claim has been posted but is not established.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

The conjecture holds for every d≥2d\ge2. More strongly, the entire marked process of low-norm maxima has a Poisson limit with independent uniform angular marks.

Write Ljn=log⁡∘jnL_jn=\log^{\circ j}n, and set

cn=L1n−L3n−log⁡(d−1),Tn=L2n (ϕn−cn),Un=σnϕn.c_n=L_1n-L_3n-\log(d-1),\qquad T_n=L_2n\,(\phi_n-c_n),\qquad U_n=\frac{\sigma_n}{\phi_n}.

Let υ\upsilon denote uniform probability measure on the simplex

Sd−1={u≥0:∑i=1dui=1}.\mathcal S_{d-1}=\left\{u\ge0:\sum_{i=1}^du_i=1\right\}.

We prove

(Tn,Un)⟹(T,U),U∼υ,T⊥U,(T_n,U_n)\Longrightarrow(T,U), \qquad U\sim\upsilon,\qquad T\perp U,

where

P(T>a)=exp⁡{−e(d−1)a(d−1)!}.(1)\mathbb P(T>a) =\exp\left\{-\frac{e^{(d-1)a}}{(d-1)!}\right\}. \tag{1}

Use the source's lower and upper truncations

ℓn=L1n−L3n−log⁡ωn,hn=L1n+2(d−1)L2n,\ell_n=L_1n-L_3n-\log\omega_n,\qquad h_n=L_1n+2(d-1)L_2n,

with ωn→∞\omega_n\to\infty sufficiently slowly. For the corresponding truncated Poisson input of intensity

ne−∥x∥11{ℓn<∥x∥1≤hn} dx,n e^{-\|x\|_1} \mathbf1_{\{\ell_n<\|x\|_1\le h_n\}}\,dx,

partition the region below any fixed normalized upper radial level into the source's grid cells, and let IαI_\alpha indicate that cell α\alpha contains a maximum.

The source proves that the Chen–Stein dependency quantities satisfy b3=0b_3=0 and, by its equations (10.3), (10.9)–(10.11),

lim sup⁡mesh→0(b1+b2)=O((L2n)−(d−3/2)(L3n)−1)+O((L1n)−(d−1)(L2n)d(L3n)−2)=o(1).(2)\limsup_{\mathrm{mesh}\to0}(b_1+b_2) = O\left((L_2n)^{-(d-3/2)}(L_3n)^{-1}\right) + O\left((L_1n)^{-(d-1)}(L_2n)^d(L_3n)^{-2}\right) =o(1). \tag{2}

The exponent is −(d−32)-(d-\tfrac32), so (2) also holds for d=2d=2.

Instead of applying only the scalar Poisson-count theorem used in the source, apply Arratia–Goldstein–Gordon's point-process Theorem 2 to the whole Bernoulli configuration:

dTV(L((Iα)α),L((Yα)α))≤4(b1+b2),d_{\mathrm{TV}}\left( \mathcal L((I_\alpha)_\alpha), \mathcal L((Y_\alpha)_\alpha) \right) \le4(b_1+b_2),

where the YαY_\alpha are independent Poisson variables of means EIα\mathbb EI_\alpha. Color the cells by any finitely many disjoint radial/angular bins, let the mesh tend to zero, and use the source's collision estimate. The resulting bin counts converge jointly to independent Poisson variables with their corresponding first-intensity means. This argument uses finite bin-count vectors and does not require total-variation convergence from atomic grids to a diffuse process.

That first intensity is explicit. Writing r=∥x∥1r=\|x\|_1, the Mecke formula gives

νn(dx)=ne−rexp⁡{−ne−rGd(hn−r)} dx,\nu_n(dx) = n e^{-r} \exp\left\{-n e^{-r}G_d(h_n-r)\right\}\,dx,

where

Gd(v)=1−e−v∑j=0d−1vjj!.G_d(v)= 1-e^{-v}\sum_{j=0}^{d-1}\frac{v^j}{j!}.

Indeed, the dominating northeast orthant above xx, cut off at radius hnh_n, has intensity ne−rGd(hn−r)ne^{-r}G_d(h_n-r). Thus the maxima intensity depends only on rr. The simplex change of variables is

dx=rd−1(d−1)! dr υ(du),u=x/r,dx=\frac{r^{d-1}}{(d-1)!}\,dr\,\upsilon(du), \qquad u=x/r,

so the angular intensity is exactly uniform for every nn.

The source's Lemma 9.1 gives the limiting cumulative radial intensity

Λ(a)=lim⁡n→∞νn{r≤cn+aL2n}=e(d−1)a(d−1)!.\Lambda(a) = \lim_{n\to\infty} \nu_n\left\{r\le c_n+\frac a{L_2n}\right\} = \frac{e^{(d-1)a}}{(d-1)!}.

Therefore, for every a<ba<b and every simplex continuity set CC,

νn{a<L2n(r−cn)≤b,u∈C}⟶(Λ(b)−Λ(a))υ(C).\nu_n\left\{ a<L_2n(r-c_n)\le b,\quad u\in C \right\} \longrightarrow \bigl(\Lambda(b)-\Lambda(a)\bigr)\upsilon(C).

Together with (2), this proves convergence of the full marked maxima process to a Poisson point process with product intensity

e(d−1)t(d−2)! dt υ(du).(3)\boxed{\displaystyle \frac{e^{(d-1)t}}{(d-2)!}\,dt\,\upsilon(du).} \tag{3}

The source's truncation and de-Poissonization couplings extend directly to whole point configurations: maxima below ℓn\ell_n occur with probability o(1)o(1); the above-ℓn\ell_n binomial and Poisson configurations couple with error o(1)o(1); and deleting points above hnh_n changes the configuration with probability

n P{Gamma⁡(d,1)>hn}=O((L1n)−(d−1))=o(1).n\,\mathbb P\{\operatorname{Gamma}(d,1)>h_n\} =O((L_1n)^{-(d-1)})=o(1).

Hence (3) also holds for the original fixed-size sample.

Finally, the lowest point of (3) is almost surely unique. Its radial survival function is e−Λ(a)e^{-\Lambda(a)}, while its angular mark is independent and uniformly distributed. Thus, for every a∈Ra\in\mathbb R and every υ\upsilon-continuity set CC,

lim⁡n→∞P{Tn≤a, Un∈C}=(1−e−e(d−1)a/(d−1)!)υ(C),\boxed{\displaystyle \lim_{n\to\infty} \mathbb P\{T_n\le a,\ U_n\in C\} = \left(1- e^{-e^{(d-1)a}/(d-1)!}\right)\upsilon(C),}

proving both conjectured uniformity and asymptotic independence.

Sources: J. A. Fill, arXiv:2601.18170, Conjecture 11.2 and Sections 4–10; R. Arratia, L. Goldstein and L. Gordon, Two Moments Suffice for Poisson Approximations: The Chen–Stein Method (1989), Theorem 2.