Uniqueness conjecture for the removal embedding

From papers

Let ρ\rho be the fixed cuspidal representation and let Multρ\mathrm{Mult}_{\rho} denote the corresponding multisegments. For hMultρ\mathfrak h\in\mathrm{Mult}_{\rho}, let λ~(h)\widetilde{\lambda}(\mathfrak h) be its co-standard representation, and let n\mathfrak n be minimal to h\mathfrak h. Write r(n,h)\mathfrak r(\mathfrak n,\mathfrak h) for the removal multisegment, labs(n)l_{\mathrm{abs}}(\mathfrak n) for its absolute length, and NlN_l for the relevant unipotent radical.

Unique embedding conjecture. The embedding

λ~(r(n,h))λ~(n)λ~(h)Nl,l=labs(n),\widetilde{\lambda}(\mathfrak r(\mathfrak n,\mathfrak h))\boxtimes\widetilde{\lambda}(\mathfrak n)\hookrightarrow\widetilde{\lambda}(\mathfrak h)_{N_l},\qquad l=l_{\mathrm{abs}}(\mathfrak n),

exists and is unique.

The conjecture strengthens the removal-embedding proposition by asserting uniqueness, not merely existence. The paper notes that this does not follow formally from multiplicity one for standard representations.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kei Yuen Chan, “Construction of simple quotients of Bernstein-Zelevinsky derivatives and highest derivative multisegments III: properties of minimal sequences”, arXiv:2601.00674 (2026).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.