The universal-enveloping-algebra expression conjecture for the hypercube Markov chain

From papers

Define the 2×22\times 2 matrices

p+=12(1+e+f)=[1/21/21/21/2],p=12(1ef)=[1/21/21/21/2],p+h=12(1+e+f)h=[1/21/21/21/2].p^+=\frac{1}{2}(1+e+f)=\begin{bmatrix}1/2&1/2\\1/2&1/2\end{bmatrix},\quad p^-=\frac{1}{2}(1-e-f)=\begin{bmatrix}1/2&-1/2\\-1/2&1/2\end{bmatrix},\quad p^+h=\frac{1}{2}(1+e+f)h=\begin{bmatrix}1/2&-1/2\\1/2&-1/2\end{bmatrix}.

Let f(x,y,z)f(x,y,z) be the sum over all orders of the matrix tensor product of xx copies of p+p^+, yy copies of pp^-, and zz copies of p+hp^+h. Define

cy,z={(y!z!(y/2)!(z/2)!((y+z)/2)!2y+z)2,if y,z are nonnegative even integers,0,otherwise.c_{y,z}=\begin{cases}\left(\frac{y!z!}{(y/2)!(z/2)!((y+z)/2)!2^{y+z}}\right)^2,&\text{if $y,z$ are nonnegative even integers},\\0,&\text{otherwise}.\end{cases}

The universal-enveloping-algebra expression conjecture. For every nn,

Kn=x+y+z=ncy,zf(x,y,z).K_n=\sum_{x+y+z=n}c_{y,z}f(x,y,z).

This conjectural formula is motivated by the observed independence of the nonzero eigenvalues from nn and has been checked through n=10n=10; its relation to a recursive description of the operators KnK_n remains to be established.

Progress summary

Open

The proposed formula has been checked in small dimensions, but no proof, counterexample, or newer resolution has been publicly reported.

Diaconis, Lin, and Ram posed this explicit matrix identity in their December 2025 paper on diagonalizing a hypercube Markov chain. The conjecture is motivated by the apparent independence of the nonzero eigenvalues from dimension.

Known results

  • The identity has been checked computationally through n=10n=10; no proof or counterexample is reported.

December 2025 publication

The paper presents the formula as Conjecture 6.3 and suggests that proving it could clarify the recursive description of the operators. No subsequent proof, disproof, verification, or claimed resolution was found.

Current status (as of August 2026): The formula is verified only through n=10n=10 and remains open in general, with no publicly documented proof or counterexample.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Persi Diaconis, Andrew Lin and Arun Ram, “Schur–Weyl duality for diagonalizing a Markov chain on the hypercube”, arXiv:2512.23285 (2025).

Solutions 1

Proof

Exact universal-enveloping-algebra formula for the binary Burnside chain

Source. Persi Diaconis, Andrew Lin, and Arun Ram, Schur–Weyl duality for diagonalizing a Markov chain on the hypercube, Conjecture 6.3. We also use and explicitly credit the coordinate-restriction property already proved by the same authors in A curiously slowly mixing Markov chain, Proposition 3.3; its one-coordinate matrix form is Proposition 6.1 in the conjecture's source.

The conjectured identity holds for every n0n\geq0. More precisely, if

p+=12(1111),p=12(1111),p+h=12(1111),(1)p^+=\frac12\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\1&1\end{pmatrix}, \qquad p^-=\frac12\begin{pmatrix}1&-1\\-1&1\end{pmatrix}, \qquad p^+h=\frac12\begin{pmatrix}1&-1\\1&-1\end{pmatrix}, \tag{1}

and f(x,y,z)f(x,y,z) is the sum of all distinct ordered tensor products containing xx factors p+p^+, yy factors pp^-, and zz factors p+hp^+h, then the binary Burnside transition matrix satisfies

Kn=x+y+z=ncy,zf(x,y,z),(2)\boxed{ K_n=\sum_{x+y+z=n}c_{y,z}f(x,y,z), } \tag{2}

where

cy,z={(y!z!(y/2)!(z/2)!((y+z)/2)!2y+z)2,y,z both even,0,otherwise.(3)c_{y,z}= \begin{cases} \displaystyle \left( \frac{y!z!} {(y/2)!(z/2)!((y+z)/2)!\,2^{y+z}} \right)^2, &y,z\text{ both even}, \\ 0,&\text{otherwise}. \end{cases} \tag{3}

In fact, the proof identifies every Walsh–Fourier matrix entry separately.

1. Walsh coordinates reduce the conjecture to a triangular coefficient formula

Let

J=12(1111).(4)J=\frac1{\sqrt2} \begin{pmatrix}1&1\\1&-1\end{pmatrix}. \tag{4}

A direct multiplication gives

Jp+J=E00,JpJ=E11,J(p+h)J=E01,(5)Jp^+J=E_{00}, \qquad Jp^-J=E_{11}, \qquad J(p^+h)J=E_{01}, \tag{5}

where EijE_{ij} denotes the corresponding matrix unit. Identify binary vectors with subsets of [n][n], and define the Walsh characters

χA(x)=(1)iAxi.(6)\chi_A(x)=(-1)^{\sum_{i\in A}x_i}. \tag{6}

The conjugated transition matrix has entries

K^n(A,B)=(JnKnJn)A,B=2nx{0,1}nχA(x)(KnχB)(x).(7)\widehat K_n(A,B) = \bigl(J^{\otimes n}K_nJ^{\otimes n}\bigr)_{A,B} = 2^{-n} \sum_{x\in\{0,1\}^n} \chi_A(x)(K_n\chi_B)(x). \tag{7}

By (5), a tensor product contributes to the (A,B)(A,B) entry exactly when

AB,x=nB,y=A,z=BA.(8)A\subseteq B, \qquad x=n-|B|, \qquad y=|A|, \qquad z=|B\setminus A|. \tag{8}

For fixed ABA\subseteq B, exactly one ordered tensor product has those prescribed matrix units at its individual coordinates. Therefore (2) is equivalent to the explicit stronger entrywise identity

K^n(A,B)={cA,BA,AB,0,A⊈B.(9)\boxed{ \widehat K_n(A,B)= \begin{cases} c_{|A|,|B\setminus A|},&A\subseteq B, \\ 0,&A\not\subseteq B. \end{cases} } \tag{9}

2. Coordinate restriction eliminates every extraneous Walsh coordinate

The previously established coordinate-restriction theorem states that observing the binary Burnside process on any coordinate subset B[n]B\subseteq[n] gives precisely the binary Burnside process on that subset. Consequently,

(KnχB)(x)=(KBχ[B])(xB).(10)(K_n\chi_B)(x) = (K_{|B|}\chi_{[|B|]})(x_B). \tag{10}

If A⊈BA\not\subseteq B, summing (7) over any coordinate in ABA\setminus B gives zero. If ABA\subseteq B, summing over the nBn-|B| remaining coordinates gives

K^n(A,B)=2Bx{0,1}BχA(x)(KBχ[B])(x).(11)\widehat K_n(A,B) = 2^{-|B|} \sum_{x\in\{0,1\}^{|B|}} \chi_A(x) (K_{|B|}\chi_{[|B|]})(x). \tag{11}

Thus it remains to calculate the full-support Walsh character in each dimension.

3. Cycle coloring reduces the character to even-cycle probabilities

Start the dimension-mm binary Burnside chain from x{0,1}mx\in\{0,1\}^m. Its first step chooses independent uniform permutations on the zero coordinates and the one coordinates. Its second step assigns an independent fair binary label to every permutation cycle, producing the next state YY.

For a cycle CC, the contribution of its common random label ξC\xi_C to the full-support character is

(1)CξC.(12)(-1)^{|C|\xi_C}. \tag{12}

Averaging over ξC\xi_C gives one if C|C| is even and zero if C|C| is odd. Therefore the conditional character expectation is the indicator that every permutation cycle in both coordinate classes has even length.

Let qjq_j be the probability that a uniform permutation of jj elements has only even cycles. The labeled-permutation cycle formula gives

j0qjtj=exp(r1t2r2r)=(1t2)1/2.(13)\sum_{j\geq0}q_jt^j = \exp\left(\sum_{r\geq1}\frac{t^{2r}}{2r}\right) = (1-t^2)^{-1/2}. \tag{13}

Hence

q2r=(2rr)4r,q2r+1=0.(14)q_{2r}=\frac{\binom{2r}{r}}{4^r}, \qquad q_{2r+1}=0. \tag{14}

The two permutations are independent, so

(Kmχ[m])(x)=qxqmx.(15)(K_m\chi_{[m]})(x) = q_{|x|}q_{m-|x|}. \tag{15}

4. A two-circle integral evaluates every coefficient

The numbers in (14) are exactly the circular cosine moments:

qj=12π02πcosjθdθ.(16)q_j= \frac1{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\cos^j\theta\,d\theta. \tag{16}

Let U=cosΘU=\cos\Theta and V=cosΦV=\cos\Phi, with Θ\Theta and Φ\Phi independent uniform circular angles. For A[m]A\subseteq[m], put

a=A,b=ma.(17)a=|A|, \qquad b=m-a. \tag{17}

Combining (11), (15), and (16), and summing independently over each binary coordinate, gives

K^m(A,[m])=2mx{0,1}m(1)iAxiE[UxVmx]=E[(VU2)a(V+U2)b].(18)\begin{aligned} \widehat K_m(A,[m]) &= 2^{-m} \sum_{x\in\{0,1\}^m} (-1)^{\sum_{i\in A}x_i} \mathbb E\left[U^{|x|}V^{m-|x|}\right] \\ &= \mathbb E\left[ \left(\frac{V-U}{2}\right)^a \left(\frac{V+U}{2}\right)^b \right]. \end{aligned} \tag{18}

For complete clarity about the angle change of variables, start instead with independent uniform circular angles S,TS,T. The map

(S,T)(S+T,ST)(mod2π)(19)(S,T) \longmapsto (S+T,S-T) \pmod{2\pi} \tag{19}

is a surjective homomorphism of the two-torus, with determinant 2-2. Haar measure therefore pushes forward to Haar measure. In particular, we can realize the independent uniform angles in (18) as

Θ=S+T,Φ=ST.\Theta=S+T, \qquad \Phi=S-T.

The elementary trigonometric identities are

VU2=sinSsinT,V+U2=cosScosT.(20)\frac{V-U}{2}=\sin S\sin T, \qquad \frac{V+U}{2}=\cos S\cos T. \tag{20}

Substitution into (18) now factors the expectation:

K^m(A,[m])=(12π02πsinaθcosbθdθ)2.(21)\widehat K_m(A,[m]) = \left( \frac1{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} \sin^a\theta\cos^b\theta\,d\theta \right)^2. \tag{21}

The integral vanishes unless both aa and bb are even. For

a=2r,b=2s,a=2r, \qquad b=2s,

the beta integral gives

12π02πsin2rθcos2sθdθ=Γ(r+12)Γ(s+12)πΓ(r+s+1)=(2r)!(2s)!22r+2sr!s!(r+s)!.(22)\begin{aligned} \frac1{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} \sin^{2r}\theta\cos^{2s}\theta\,d\theta &= \frac{\Gamma(r+\tfrac12)\Gamma(s+\tfrac12)} {\pi\,\Gamma(r+s+1)} \\ &= \frac{(2r)!(2s)!} {2^{2r+2s}r!s!(r+s)!}. \end{aligned} \tag{22}

Squaring (22) proves that (21) is exactly ca,bc_{a,b} from (3). Together with coordinate restriction in Section 2, this proves (9), and therefore the full conjectured identity (2), simultaneously for every dimension.

As a further interpretation absent from the conjectural statement, every coefficient is the square of an explicit mixed circular moment:

ca,b=(E[sinaΘcosbΘ])2.(23)\boxed{ c_{a,b} = \left( \mathbb E\left[\sin^a\Theta\cos^b\Theta\right] \right)^2. } \tag{23}

In particular, the previously observed diagonal coefficients recover the known binary Burnside eigenvalues:

c2r,0=(2rr)224r.(24)c_{2r,0} = \frac{\binom{2r}{r}^2}{2^{4r}}. \tag{24}

The separate higher-alphabet conjecture, Conjecture 6.4 in the same paper, is not asserted here.

Conclusion: Conjecture 6.3 is PROVED for every nn.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·