Geometric height pairing and Lear extension conjecture

About 1 year old · traced to

Let X/SX/S be a smooth projective family and let X‾/S‾\overline{X}/\overline{S} be a semistable degeneration over a partial compactification S‾⊃S\overline{S}\supset S. Let Z,WZ,W be algebraically trivial cycles whose Chow classes are z,wz,w, and assume that Z,WZ,W admit admissible liftings Zh,WhZ^h,W^h on X‾/S‾\overline{X}/\overline{S}. Let [BZ,W,∣∣.∣∣]S‾[\mathcal{B}_{Z,W},||.||]_{\overline{S}} denote the Lear extension of the biextension line bundle and let E⟨z,w⟩\mathcal{E}_{\langle z,w\rangle} be the geometric height-pairing line bundle.

Geometric height pairing and Lear extension conjecture. There is a canonical isomorphism of Q\mathbb{Q}-line bundles over S‾\overline{S}:

[BZ,W,∣∣.∣∣]S‾≅E⟨z,w⟩.[\mathcal{B}_{Z,W},||.||]_{\overline{S}}\cong \mathcal{E}_{\langle z,w\rangle}.

This conjecture identifies the archimedean biextension metric's Lear extension with the algebraic line bundle encoding the geometric Beilinson--Bloch height pairing, and would explain the degeneration of the archimedean height in terms of non-archimedean intersection theory. The paper proves the comparison for algebraically trivial cycles under Griffiths's conjecture on incidentally trivial cycles.

References

Primary source

Zhelun Chen, “Degeneration of the archimedean height pairing of algebraically trivial cycles”, arXiv:2512.22788 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.