Determinant formula for the first appearance value of standard Vandermonde matrices
Let be the standard Vandermonde matrix associated with , let be its associated permutation-sum function, and let denote its determinant. The first appearance degree is .
Standard-Vandermonde determinant formula. The first appearance value is
The relationship was verified by exact calculation for through ; the supplied status evidence therefore records this candidate as solved.
References
Primary source
Kenichi Takemura, “Alternating Power Difference and Matrix Symmetry: Closed-Form Formulas for the First Appearance Degree m_1”, arXiv:2512.18169 (2025).
Additional references
5 papers in this index state this conjecture (2010–2025). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2410.02286, arXiv:2309.01123, arXiv:2207.11200, arXiv:1012.2719.
Progress summary
A new posted argument claims a complete proof, but no independent verification has confirmed it, so the formula is not settled.
Kenichi Takemura proposed the identity in a December 2025 preprint, together with the claim that the first nonzero degree is .
December 2025 conjecture
The preprint records exact agreement for and gives the equivalent product formula , but labels the general statements conjectural and calls for rigorous proofs.
Posted attempt
A posted argument claims a complete proof: it derives for every square matrix, then uses the first column of to obtain the proposed formula and the Vandermonde product. The argument has not been independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): the formula and have computational support and a complete proof has been posted, but neither the proof nor the general claim has independent verification.
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
For every matrix , write . The determinant expansion gives
As ,
Since has rank one, determinant multilinearity implies
The coefficient also follows directly from
Hence, universally,
For the standard Vandermonde matrix
its first column equals , so
Consequently
The Vandermonde product gives
Substituting into (1) proves both equivalent formulas:
The positive leading coefficient also proves .