First appearance value conjecture for multiplication-table lattices

About 1 year old · traced to

Let MnM_n be the nn-th order multiplication-table first-power lattice and let f1f_1 be its associated permutation-sum function. Define Tn−1=n(n−1)/2T_{n-1}=n(n-1)/2.

Multiplication-table lattice value conjecture. For n≥2n \geq 2,

APD⁡Tn−1(f1)=Tn−1!∏k=1n−1k!.\operatorname{APD}_{T_{n-1}}(f_1)=T_{n-1}!\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

The relationship has been verified for n≤7n \leq 7 by exact integer arithmetic, but no general proof is supplied.

References

Primary source

Kenichi Takemura, “Alternating Power Difference and Matrix Symmetry: Closed-Form Formulas for the First Appearance Degree m_1”, arXiv:2512.18169 (2025).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A posted argument claims a complete proof of the factorial formula, but it has not been independently checked and the published source still presents the result as a conjecture.

Kenichi Takemura’s paper, posted in December 2025, conjectures that the first nonzero value for the first-power multiplication table is Tn−1!∏k=1n−1k!T_{n-1}!\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

Known results

  • Exact integer arithmetic verifies the formula for n≤7n\le 7; the paper supplies no proof for general n≥2n\ge 2.

Posted attempt

A posted argument claims a complete proof: it derives the first-appearance coefficient from the determinant generating function and a Vandermonde factorization for Mij=ijM_{ij}=ij. The argument has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The formula is verified for n≤7n\le 7 and has an unverified claimed proof, while general validity for n≥2n\ge 2 remains unsettled.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

For any n×nn\times n matrix AA, the determinant expansion gives

∑m≥0APD⁡m(A)zmm!=det⁡(ezAij)i,j=1n.(1)\sum_{m\ge0}\operatorname{APD}_m(A)\frac{z^m}{m!} =\det(e^{zA_{ij}})_{i,j=1}^n. \tag{1}

Set T=(n2)T=\binom n2. First consider the multiplication table Mij=ijM_{ij}=ij. With y=ezy=e^z, the Vandermonde determinant gives

det⁡(ezij)i,j=1n=det⁡(yij)i,j=1n=yn(n+1)/2∏1≤i<j≤n(yj−yi).\det(e^{zij})_{i,j=1}^n =\det(y^{ij})_{i,j=1}^n =y^{n(n+1)/2} \prod_{1\le i<j\le n}(y^j-y^i).

Each factor satisfies yj−yi=(j−i)z+O(z2)y^j-y^i=(j-i)z+O(z^2). Since there are TT factors and

∏1≤i<j≤n(j−i)=∏k=1n−1k!,\prod_{1\le i<j\le n}(j-i)=\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!,

equation (1) yields

m1(M)=T,APD⁡T(M)=T!∏k=1n−1k!.m_1(M)=T,\qquad \operatorname{APD}_T(M)=T!\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

Now take the row-shifted second-power lattice

Aij=(j+(i−1)d)2,d>0,A_{ij}=(j+(i-1)d)^2,\qquad d>0,

and put q=e2dzq=e^{2dz}. Since

Aij=j2+d2(i−1)2+2d(i−1)j,A_{ij}=j^2+d^2(i-1)^2+2d(i-1)j,

extracting row and column factors gives

det⁡(ezAij)=exp⁡(z∑j=1nj2+zd2∑i=0n−1i2)qT∏0≤i<j≤n−1(qj−qi).\det(e^{zA_{ij}}) = \exp\left( z\sum_{j=1}^n j^2+ zd^2\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}i^2 \right) q^T \prod_{0\le i<j\le n-1}(q^j-q^i).

Because

qj−qi=2d(j−i)z+O(z2),q^j-q^i=2d(j-i)z+O(z^2),

this determinant has exact vanishing order TT and leading coefficient

(2d)T∏k=1n−1k!.(2d)^T\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

Therefore

m1(A)=(n2),APD⁡(n2)(A)=(2d)(n2)((n2))!∏k=1n−1k!.m_1(A)=\binom n2, \qquad \operatorname{APD}_{\binom n2}(A) =(2d)^{\binom n2} \left(\binom n2\right)! \prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!.

Equivalently, if

VCore(n)=T!∏k=1n−1k!,V_{\mathrm{Core}}(n)=T!\prod_{k=1}^{n-1}k!,

then

APD⁡T(A)=(2d)TVCore(n).\operatorname{APD}_T(A)=(2d)^TV_{\mathrm{Core}}(n).

These identities hold for every n≥2n\ge2 and every positive integer dd.