Mazur–Tate's order-of-vanishing and weak main conjectures
Mazur–Tate's order-of-vanishing and weak main conjectures
Let be an elliptic curve over , let be an abelian number field of conductor , and set . Let be a ring such that contains the Mazur–Tate element . Write for the augmentation ideal of , for the integral Selmer group, , and for the number of primes dividing at which has split-multiplicative reduction. The zeroth Fitting ideal of an -module is denoted by .
Mazur–Tate conjecture. The following claims are valid:
\nand
These are respectively the order-of-vanishing conjecture and the weak main conjecture of Mazur and Tate. The paper studies their -parts and proves results under suitable hypotheses, but the claims are presented here as conjectures and are not resolved in general.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Dominik Bullach and Matthew H. L. Honnor, “On the refined `Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer type' conjectures of Mazur and Tate”, arXiv:2511.07203 (2025).
Additional references
5 papers in this index state this conjecture (2016–2025). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2203.12157, arXiv:2008.02422, arXiv:1804.00418, arXiv:1612.03743.
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.