The level-(0,1)(0,-1) geometric action conjecture for affine type A

Fix kIk\in I, let v=(v0,,vN1)\boldsymbol v=(v_0,\ldots,v_{N-1}) and let M(v,w)\mathcal M(\boldsymbol v,\boldsymbol w) be the quiver variety of type AN1(1)A^{(1)}_{N-1} with w=(δi,k)\boldsymbol w=(\delta_{i,k}). Let ET(M(v,w))\mathrm E_\mathrm T(\mathcal M(\boldsymbol v,\boldsymbol w)) be its equivariant elliptic cohomology, let Fu(0,1)(k)\mathcal F^{(0,-1)(k)}_u be the stated level-(0,1)(0,-1) representation of Ut1,t2,p(glN,tor)U_{t_1,t_2,p}(\mathfrak{gl}_{N,tor}), and let λu(k)|\lambda\rangle^{(k)}_u and [λ][\lambda] denote respectively its partition-labelled basis vector and the corresponding T\mathrm T-fixed-point class.

Level-(0,1)(0,-1) geometric action conjecture. The representation Fu(0,1)(k)\mathcal F^{(0,-1)(k)}_u of Ut1,t2,p(glN,tor)U_{t_1,t_2,p}(\mathfrak{gl}_{N,tor}) is equivalent to an expected level-(0,1)(0,-1) geometric action of the same algebra on

vET(M(v,(δi,k))),\bigoplus_{\boldsymbol v}\mathrm E_\mathrm T(\mathcal M(\boldsymbol v,(\delta_{i,k}))),

under the identification of λu(k)|\lambda\rangle^{(k)}_u with the T\mathrm T-fixed-point class [λ][\lambda].

This conjecture asserts that the representation constructed in the paper matches the expected elliptic-cohomological action on the affine type-A quiver varieties. The source gives no resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Hitoshi Konno and Andrey Smirnov, “Elliptic Quantum Toroidal Algebra U_t_1,t_2,p(gl_N,tor) and Elliptic Stable Envelopes for the A^(1)_N-1 Quiver Varieties”, arXiv:2510.22992 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.