The monadic description of derived D-modules for derived affine schemes

From papers

Let A\CAlg\C\cn,\lfpA \in \CAlg^{ \cn, \lfp }_{ \C } be possibly unbounded, let \g\LieAlgbdA\g \in \LieAlgbd_{ A }, and let \MC(\g)\MC(\g) be the formal moduli problem under \SpecA\Spec A associated to \g\g. The category \IndCoh0(\MC(\g)/A)\IndCoh_{ 0 }(\MC(\g)/A) is defined as in Beraldo's construction.

Derived D-module equivalence. There exists a symmetric monoidal equivalence

\IndCoh0(\MC(\g)/A)\LModU(\g).\IndCoh_{ 0 }(\MC(\g)/A) \stackrel{\sim}{\longrightarrow} \LMod_{ U(\g) }.

This extends the known bounded case to possibly unbounded derived affine schemes. The claim concerns the compatibility between the ind-coherent definition of derived D-modules and representations of the universal enveloping algebra; the source says that the associated formal moduli problem should be used even though the relevant correspondence is not an equivalence.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Carlo Buccisano, “On derived D-modules and their several definitions”, arXiv:2510.15665 (2025).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.