The Mersenne-type binary polynomial odd-sequence length conjecture

About 1 year old · traced to

Let M1=x2+x+1M_1=x^2+x+1, and let the odd sequence of a polynomial be the sequence of odd polynomials obtained by the binary polynomial Collatz transformations. Let r≥1r\geq 1 and 0≤j≤2r−1−10\leq j\leq 2^{r-1}-1, and set

A=M12r−j+1.A=M_1^{2^r-j}+1.

Odd-sequence length conjecture. The length of the odd sequence of AA is j+1j+1. The claim concerns the special family M1n+1M_1^n+1 and is supported by the examples and computations displayed in the source, but remains unproved there.

References

Primary source

Luis H. Gallardo and Olivier Rahavandrainy, “A variant of Collatz's Conjecture over Binary Polynomials”, arXiv:2510.07530 (2025).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A 2025 paper left the formula unproved, while a new reader-submitted argument claims to prove it but has not been checked.

Gallardo and Rahavandrainy formulate the conjecture for the family M12r−j+1M_1^{2^r-j}+1, predicting odd-sequence length j+1j+1. Their paper presents computations supporting the formula but does not prove it.

Known results

  • Gallardo and Rahavandrainy (2025) prove termination for every nonzero binary polynomial, with bound rA≤2deg⁡(A)−1r_A\leq 2^{\deg(A)-1}.
  • Their computations for n∈{9,…,16}n\in\{9,\ldots,16\} give the predicted lengths for this family.
  • An earlier paper (2023) proves results for related subfamilies and special cases, but not the full formula.
  • The 2026 published version still labels the assertion Conjecture 3.1.

Community submission (unverified; August 25, 2026)

A submitted proof argues for an invariant subring in F2[x]\mathbb F_2[x], derives valuation formulas for successive transformations, and claims an exact phase decomposition yielding the conjectured length. The argument is unverified.

Current status (as of August 2026): General termination is proved, but the exact length formula for the stated family remains unverified; a reader-submitted proof is the only reported new progress.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

Exact stopping times and complete phase decomposition for the Mersenne-polynomial family

Work in F2[x]\mathbb F_2[x], and write

y=x(x+1),z=1+y=x2+x+1.(1)y=x(x+1),\qquad z=1+y=x^2+x+1. \tag{1}

For a nonzero F(y)∈F2[y]F(y)\in\mathbb F_2[y], substitution into F2[x]\mathbb F_2[x] gives

vx(F(y))=vx+1(F(y))=vy(F),odd⁡x(F(y))=F(y)yvy(F).(2)v_x(F(y))=v_{x+1}(F(y))=v_y(F), \qquad \operatorname{odd}_x(F(y)) =\frac{F(y)}{y^{v_y(F)}}. \tag{2}

Indeed, after extracting yvy(F)y^{v_y(F)}, the remaining factor has constant term 11, and therefore evaluates to 11 at both x=0x=0 and x=1x=1. In particular, the entire odd trajectory starting from any element of F2[y]\mathbb F_2[y] remains in this invariant subring, where its accelerated transition is

T(Q)=odd⁡y(zQ+1),Q(0)=1.(3)\mathcal T(Q)=\operatorname{odd}_y(zQ+1), \qquad Q(0)=1. \tag{3}

For every integer n≥1n\geq1, put

a=2v2(n),n=au  (u odd),Gn(y)=zn+1ya.(4)a=2^{v_2(n)},\qquad n=au\ \ (u\text{ odd}), \qquad G_n(y)=\frac{z^n+1}{y^a}. \tag{4}

Since za=1+yaz^a=1+y^a in characteristic two, the numerator in (4) has exact yy-adic valuation aa. Thus Gn(0)=1G_n(0)=1, and GnG_n is precisely the first odd polynomial associated with the starting polynomial zn+1z^n+1. If u=1u=1, then Gn=1G_n=1 immediately.

Suppose henceforth that u>1u>1, and define

b=2v2(u−1),δ=a(b−1),n′=n+δ.(5)b=2^{v_2(u-1)},\qquad \delta=a(b-1),\qquad n'=n+\delta. \tag{5}

Here b≥2b\geq2. Writing u=1+bcu=1+bc, where cc is odd, and putting w=yaw=y^a, we obtain

Gn+1=(1+w)u+1+ww=(1+w)((1+wb)c+1)w.(6)G_n+1 =\frac{(1+w)^u+1+w}{w} =\frac{(1+w)\bigl((1+w^b)^c+1\bigr)}{w}. \tag{6}

The bracketed factor has exact ww-adic valuation bb, because cc is odd. Consequently,

vy(Gn+1)=a(b−1)=δ.(7)v_y(G_n+1)=a(b-1)=\delta. \tag{7}

Introduce the unaccelerated affine operator

L(Q)=zQ+1y.(8)L(Q)=\frac{zQ+1}{y}. \tag{8}

A direct induction, using z=1+yz=1+y, gives the exact iterate formula

Lt(Q)=1+zt(Q+1)yt(0≤t≤vy(Q+1)).(9)L^t(Q)=1+\frac{z^t(Q+1)}{y^t} \qquad(0\leq t\leq v_y(Q+1)). \tag{9}

For 0≤t<δ0\leq t<\delta, equation (7) shows that Lt(Gn)L^t(G_n) is a polynomial with constant term 11. Therefore the first δ−1\delta-1 accelerated transitions remove exactly one power of yy, and the δ\delta-th removes the entire remaining yy-power. Hence

Tt(Gn)=1+zt(Gn+1)yt(0≤t<δ),Tδ(Gn)=odd⁡y(Lδ(Gn)).(10)\mathcal T^t(G_n) =1+\frac{z^t(G_n+1)}{y^t} \quad(0\leq t<\delta), \qquad \mathcal T^{\delta}(G_n) =\operatorname{odd}_y\bigl(L^{\delta}(G_n)\bigr). \tag{10}

Now a+δ=aba+\delta=ab, and both aa and abab are powers of two. Therefore za=1+yaz^a=1+y^a and zab=1+yabz^{ab}=1+y^{ab}. Substituting (4) into (9) yields

Lδ(Gn)=yab+zδ(zn+1+ya)yab=yab+zn′+zδ+ayab=yab+zn′+zabyab=zn′+1yab.(11)\begin{aligned} L^{\delta}(G_n) &=\frac{y^{ab}+z^{\delta}(z^n+1+y^a)}{y^{ab}}\\ &=\frac{y^{ab}+z^{n'}+z^{\delta+a}}{y^{ab}}\\ &=\frac{y^{ab}+z^{n'}+z^{ab}}{y^{ab}} =\frac{z^{n'}+1}{y^{ab}}. \end{aligned} \tag{11}

Moreover,

n′=a(u+b−1)=ab(c+1),a′=2v2(n′)≥2ab.(12)n'=a(u+b-1)=ab(c+1), \qquad a'=2^{v_2(n')}\geq 2ab. \tag{12}

Taking the odd part of (11) consequently proves the exact phase-transition theorem

 Tδ(Gn)=Gn′,δ=n′−n. (13)\boxed{\ \mathcal T^{\delta}(G_n)=G_{n'}, \qquad \delta=n'-n.\ } \tag{13}

Let N=2⌈log⁡2n⌉N=2^{\lceil\log_2 n\rceil}. If nn is not a power of two, write N=aKN=aK, where KK is a power of two and u<Ku<K. Since u−1=bcu-1=bc, with cc odd, and b∣Kb\mid K, we have

c≤Kb−1,n′=ab(c+1)≤aK=N.(14)c\leq\frac Kb-1, \qquad n'=ab(c+1)\leq aK=N. \tag{14}

Thus each phase strictly increases nn, never passes NN, and strictly increases its 22-adic valuation by (12). Iterating (13) must therefore reach a power of two, necessarily NN. If

n=n0<n1<⋯<ns=N,δi=ni+1−ni,(15)n=n_0<n_1<\cdots<n_s=N, \qquad \delta_i=n_{i+1}-n_i, \tag{15}

then the number of accelerated odd transitions telescopes:

∑i=0s−1δi=N−n.(16)\sum_{i=0}^{s-1}\delta_i=N-n. \tag{16}

The initial odd polynomial is included in the odd sequence, and GN=1G_N=1 is its final term. Therefore the exact odd-sequence length is

 rzn+1=2⌈log⁡2n⌉−n+1(n≥1). (17)\boxed{\ r_{z^n+1}=2^{\lceil\log_2 n\rceil}-n+1 \qquad(n\geq1).\ } \tag{17}

The argument also determines the entire degree profile. Within the ii-th phase, all δi\delta_i odd polynomials preceding the next phase have the same xx-degree, namely

2(ni−2v2(ni)),(18)2\bigl(n_i-2^{v_2(n_i)}\bigr), \tag{18}

because (10) preserves yy-degree. The sequence ends with the single degree 00. Its successive xx- and (x+1)(x+1)-valuations coincide; within a phase they equal 11 for the first δi−1\delta_i-1 transitions, and the final transition has common valuation

1+2v2(ni+1)−2v2(ni) 2v2(ni/2v2(ni)−1).(19)1+2^{v_2(n_{i+1})} -2^{v_2(n_i)}\,2^{v_2(n_i/2^{v_2(n_i)}-1)}. \tag{19}

Finally, under the precise hypotheses of Conjecture 3.1, take n=2r−jn=2^r-j, with r≥1r\geq1 and 0≤j≤2r−1−10\leq j\leq2^{r-1}-1. Then 2⌈log⁡2n⌉=2r2^{\lceil\log_2 n\rceil}=2^r, so (17) gives

 r(x2+x+1)2r−j+1=j+1. (20)\boxed{\ r_{(x^2+x+1)^{2^r-j}+1}=j+1.\ } \tag{20}

This proves the published conjecture for every admissible pair (r,j)(r,j), and the explicit phase and degree descriptions give the full orbit rather than only its stopping time.

Source: Luis H. Gallardo and Olivier Rahavandrainy, A variant of Collatz's conjecture over binary polynomials, Revista de la Unión Matemática Argentina 69 (2026), 295–302, Conjecture 3.1.