The Mersenne-type binary polynomial odd-sequence length conjecture
Let , and let the odd sequence of a polynomial be the sequence of odd polynomials obtained by the binary polynomial Collatz transformations. Let and , and set
Odd-sequence length conjecture. The length of the odd sequence of is . The claim concerns the special family and is supported by the examples and computations displayed in the source, but remains unproved there.
References
Primary source
Luis H. Gallardo and Olivier Rahavandrainy, “A variant of Collatz's Conjecture over Binary Polynomials”, arXiv:2510.07530 (2025).
Progress summary
A 2025 paper left the formula unproved, while a new reader-submitted argument claims to prove it but has not been checked.
Gallardo and Rahavandrainy formulate the conjecture for the family , predicting odd-sequence length . Their paper presents computations supporting the formula but does not prove it.
Known results
- Gallardo and Rahavandrainy (2025) prove termination for every nonzero binary polynomial, with bound .
- Their computations for give the predicted lengths for this family.
- An earlier paper (2023) proves results for related subfamilies and special cases, but not the full formula.
- The 2026 published version still labels the assertion Conjecture 3.1.
Community submission (unverified; August 25, 2026)
A submitted proof argues for an invariant subring in , derives valuation formulas for successive transformations, and claims an exact phase decomposition yielding the conjectured length. The argument is unverified.
Current status (as of August 2026): General termination is proved, but the exact length formula for the stated family remains unverified; a reader-submitted proof is the only reported new progress.
Sources
- arxiv.org
- inmabb.criba.edu.ar
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- hal.science
- annals.math.princeton.edu
- mathoverflow.net
- quantamagazine.org
- hrj.episciences.org
- quantamagazine.org
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- quantamagazine.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- quantamagazine.org
- quantamagazine.org
- x.com
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
Exact stopping times and complete phase decomposition for the Mersenne-polynomial family
Work in , and write
For a nonzero , substitution into gives
Indeed, after extracting , the remaining factor has constant term , and therefore evaluates to at both and . In particular, the entire odd trajectory starting from any element of remains in this invariant subring, where its accelerated transition is
For every integer , put
Since in characteristic two, the numerator in (4) has exact -adic valuation . Thus , and is precisely the first odd polynomial associated with the starting polynomial . If , then immediately.
Suppose henceforth that , and define
Here . Writing , where is odd, and putting , we obtain
The bracketed factor has exact -adic valuation , because is odd. Consequently,
Introduce the unaccelerated affine operator
A direct induction, using , gives the exact iterate formula
For , equation (7) shows that is a polynomial with constant term . Therefore the first accelerated transitions remove exactly one power of , and the -th removes the entire remaining -power. Hence
Now , and both and are powers of two. Therefore and . Substituting (4) into (9) yields
Moreover,
Taking the odd part of (11) consequently proves the exact phase-transition theorem
Let . If is not a power of two, write , where is a power of two and . Since , with odd, and , we have
Thus each phase strictly increases , never passes , and strictly increases its -adic valuation by (12). Iterating (13) must therefore reach a power of two, necessarily . If
then the number of accelerated odd transitions telescopes:
The initial odd polynomial is included in the odd sequence, and is its final term. Therefore the exact odd-sequence length is
The argument also determines the entire degree profile. Within the -th phase, all odd polynomials preceding the next phase have the same -degree, namely
because (10) preserves -degree. The sequence ends with the single degree . Its successive - and -valuations coincide; within a phase they equal for the first transitions, and the final transition has common valuation
Finally, under the precise hypotheses of Conjecture 3.1, take , with and . Then , so (17) gives
This proves the published conjecture for every admissible pair , and the explicit phase and degree descriptions give the full orbit rather than only its stopping time.
Source: Luis H. Gallardo and Olivier Rahavandrainy, A variant of Collatz's conjecture over binary polynomials, Revista de la Unión Matemática Argentina 69 (2026), 295–302, Conjecture 3.1.