The optimal exponential-sum conjecture for one-dimensional Strichartz estimates

About 1 year old · traced to

Let T≥λ1/3T\geq \lambda^{1/3}, let ψ(hDt)vh(t,x)\psi(hD_t)v_h(t,x) denote the frequency-localized solution under consideration, and assume that sharp exponential-sum bounds hold for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0. The conjectured dispersive estimate is

∣ψ(hDt)vh(t,x)∣≲1hh1/3−ϵ,∀ϵ>0.\left|\psi(hD_t)v_h(t,x)\right|\lesssim \frac{1}{h}h^{1/3-\epsilon},\qquad \forall\epsilon>0.

Optimal-loss conjecture. Under these sharp exponential-sum bounds, the Strichartz estimates should hold with loss 1/6+ϵ1/6+\epsilon for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and arbitrary L2(R+)L^2(\mathbb R_+) data. The same estimates are expected for solutions of the semiclassical Schrödinger equation in the Friedlander domain in dimension d≥2d\geq 2 and in a ball.

A loss of 1/61/6 derivatives is known to be unavoidable from gallery-mode initial data, so the conjectured 1/6+ϵ1/6+\epsilon loss would be optimal up to an arbitrarily small error. The paper establishes improved estimates using Van der Corput bounds, but the sharp exponential-sum estimates required here remain unavailable.

References

Primary source

Oana Ivanovici, “Strichartz and dispersive estimates for quantum bouncing ball model: exponential sums and Van der Corput methods in 1d semi-classical Schrödinger equations”, arXiv:2510.01779 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.