Conjectural formula for optimal solutions with k-1 clean columns
Conjectural formula for optimal solutions with k-1 clean columns
Let denote the number of optimal solutions for the grid in the paper's notation. In the case of a grid with rows and columns, where , the clean-column counting conjecture. For all integers ,
The formula is proposed because the authors' counting argument for solutions with exactly clean columns is incomplete, and they identify the resulting values with the OEIS sequence A084857. The status of this enumeration remains open in the supplied text.
Progress summary
The proposed counting formula remains unproved, with no public counterexample or later verification found.
The conjecture asserts that the number of optimal solutions on a two-row grid with an odd number of columns is given by for . The source says the formula matches computed values and OEIS sequence A084857, but the argument for configurations with exactly clean columns is incomplete.
Known results
- Configurations with exactly clean columns are counted by .
- Writing the unresolved contribution as , the conjecture would give .
- The source explicitly lists settling the formula as an open direction.
Current status (as of August 2026): The formula remains an open conjecture; its -clean-column contribution is established, but the -clean-column count has neither a verified proof nor a known disproof.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
El-Mehdi Mehiri and Mohammed L. Nadji, “The Power Contamination Problem on Grids Revisited: Optimality, Combinatorics, and Links to Integer Sequences”, arXiv:2509.12756 (2026).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
On a two-row grid the applicable contamination rules are precisely the threshold-two rule on the ladder: an uncontaminated vertex becomes contaminated when at least two horizontal or vertical neighbors are contaminated. Encode initial column states by (empty, top only, bottom only, full).
A configuration fully contaminates the ladder if and only if (i) its first and last columns are nonempty; (ii) no two consecutive columns are empty; and (iii) there is an column or an adjacent or pair. Necessity of (i)–(ii) follows because an empty boundary column or two consecutive empty columns never receive their first contamination. If (iii) fails, the only possible new contamination fills an empty column situated between two same-row singleton columns; it produces another singleton in that same row, preserving the absence of full columns and opposite-row adjacent singletons. Thus full contamination is impossible. Conversely, an column is already full, while an adjacent or pair immediately creates a full column. A full column absorbs an adjacent nonempty column. It also crosses a single empty column followed by a nonempty column: infect the intermediate vertex in the farther occupied row using its two horizontal neighbors, then infect the other intermediate vertex using its vertical neighbor and the original full column. Conditions (i)–(ii) propagate this to both boundaries.
For , , a minimum contamination set has vertices. If one column is full, there are singleton and empty columns. Conditions (i)–(ii) force the unique alternating occupied/empty pattern. Choose the full column in ways and assign the remaining singleton rows freely, giving configurations.
Otherwise all occupied columns are singletons and the empty columns are nonadjacent interior positions. Their patterns number . Each such pattern has runs of occupied columns, so its singleton adjacency graph has edges. Since these two edges form a forest, exactly of the top/bottom assignments are constant along both edges. Condition (iii) accepts the other assignments. Hence the number with clean columns is
Therefore
For , the one-column ladder has exactly one minimum contamination set, also agreeing with the same formula.