The main torsion-length inequality for crystalline and de Rham cohomology

About 1 year old · traced to

Let X/OKX/\mathcal{O}_K be the fixed smooth proper scheme in the paper, with special fibre XkX_k, where WW is the ring of Witt vectors and ee is the ramification index of OK\mathcal{O}_K over its maximal unramified subring. For each i⩾0i\geqslant 0, write

ℓcrysi=ℓW(Hcrysi(Xk/W)[p∞]),ℓdRi=ℓOK(HdRi(X/OK)[p∞]).\ell^i_\mathrm{crys}=\ell_W\left(\mathrm{H}^i_\mathrm{crys}(X_k/W)[p^\infty]\right),\qquad \ell^i_\mathrm{dR}=\ell_{\mathcal{O}_K}\left(\mathrm{H}^i_\mathrm{dR}(X/\mathcal{O}_K)[p^\infty]\right).

Main conjecture. For all i⩾0i\geqslant 0,

ℓcrysi⩽ℓdRi⩽e⋅ℓcrysi.\ell^i_\mathrm{crys}\leqslant \ell^i_\mathrm{dR}\leqslant e\cdot\ell^i_\mathrm{crys}.

These inequalities would give a uniform comparison between the lengths of crystalline and de Rham torsion. The paper develops an integral crystalline–de Rham comparison framework and verifies the conjecture in a small number of cases, while the general assertion remains open.

References

Primary source

Abhinandan and Alex Youcis, “An integral comparison of crystalline and de Rham cohomology”, arXiv:2507.17631 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.