Stabilization conjecture for dominant affine Bruhat intervals

Let W=\mathbbmZΦWfW=\mathbbm{Z}\Phi^\vee\rtimes W_f be an affine Weyl group, with coweight lattice Λ\Lambda^\vee. Let AxA_x be the alcove corresponding to xx. For μΛ\mu\in\Lambda^\vee, define x+μx+\mu by Ax+μ=μ+AxA_{x+\mu}=\mu+A_x. An element xWx\in W is dominant if AxA_x lies in the dominant chamber, and a coweight is dominant if it lies in the closed dominant chamber. Write [x,y][x,y] for a Bruhat interval.

Stabilization conjecture. For any dominant coweight λΛ\lambda\in\Lambda^\vee and dominant x,yWx,y\in W, there exists an integer N0=N0(x,y,λ)N_0=N_0(x,y,\lambda) such that for every NN0N\geq N_0,

[x+N0λ,y+N0λ][x+Nλ,y+Nλ].[x+N_0\lambda,y+N_0\lambda]\cong[x+N\lambda,y+N\lambda].

The conjecture asserts eventual stabilization of translated dominant affine Bruhat intervals. The source presents it as a conjecture and supplies no resolution status in the given material.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Gaston Burrull, Nicolas Libedinsky and Rodrigo Villegas, “Shape and class of Bruhat Intervals”, arXiv:2507.14033 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.