The negative partial-sum conjecture for normalization of aggregated Markov-chain distributions

From papers

Let an aggregation of a Markov chain have approximated transient distribution p~k\tilde{p}_k and transient distribution pkp_k, where kNk \in \mathbb{N}, and let nn be the number of coordinates. The inequality referred to in the source as

compares the normalized approximation with the unnormalized approximation. **Negative \partial-\sum conjecture.** If there are pairwise different indices $i_1, \dots, i_{n-1}$ such that

\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}\tilde{p}_k(i_j) \leq -1,

thenthen

holds true.

This is one of three explicitly described as unproven postulations in the paper. Its precise mathematical status beyond the paper is not established by the supplied material.

Progress summary

Open

The conjecture is recorded as unproved, and no publicly documented proof, counterexample, or substantive follow-up was found.

The conjecture concerns whether a normalization inequality follows from a sufficiently negative partial sum among n1n-1 distinct coordinates of an aggregated Markov-chain approximation. The supplied source lists it among three unproved postulations; no later mathematical progress was found in the retrieved material.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture remains open, with no recorded proof, counterexample, or verified progress.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Patrick Sonnentag, “Finding the Smallest Possible Exact Aggregation of a Markov Chain”, arXiv:2507.11157 (2025).

Solutions 1

Proof

The indexed conjecture holds, as do both other unproved normalization conjectures in the same source. In fact there is a sharp necessary-and-sufficient criterion, and the source's positive-coordinate constant 9/89/8 is optimal.

Let xRd{0}x\in\mathbb R^d\setminus\{0\}, a=x1a=\|x\|_1, and let pp be an arbitrary probability vector. We ask when

xap1xp1\left\|\frac{x}{a}-p\right\|_1 \le \|x-p\|_1

holds for every such pp.

For a>1a>1, the exact criterion is

There is no S{i:xi>0} satisfying a2<iSxi<a(3a)2.\boxed{ \text{There is no }S\subseteq\{i:x_i>0\} \text{ satisfying } \frac a2 < \sum_{i\in S}x_i < \frac{a(3-a)}2. }

To prove this, put i=xi/a\ell_i=x_i/a and ci=(a1)ic_i=(a-1)\ell_i for xi>0x_i>0. Direct coordinatewise evaluation gives

xp1xap1=a12i:xi>0min((pii)+,ci).\|x-p\|_1- \left\|\frac{x}{a}-p\right\|_1 = a-1 - 2\sum_{i:x_i>0} \min\bigl((p_i-\ell_i)_+,c_i\bigr).

For S{i:xi>0}S\subseteq\{i:x_i>0\}, let LS=iSiL_S=\sum_{i\in S}\ell_i. Optimizing over the probability simplex gives exactly

suppi:xi>0min((pii)+,ci)=maxS:LS1min{1LS,(a1)LS}.\sup_p \sum_{i:x_i>0} \min\bigl((p_i-\ell_i)_+,c_i\bigr) = \max_{S:L_S\le1} \min\{1-L_S,(a-1)L_S\}.

Indeed, for each active set the summand is bounded by both available probability mass and total capacity; conversely, first allocate its baseline masses i\ell_i, then distribute the remaining mass up to these capacities. Therefore the normalization fails for some pp precisely when

12<LS<3a2,\frac12<L_S<\frac{3-a}{2},

equivalently when the boxed forbidden subset exists. In particular, a2a\ge2 always implies improvement.

Now set

N=xi<0(xi),P+=xi>0xi,a=P++N.N_-=\sum_{x_i<0}(-x_i), \qquad P_+=\sum_{x_i>0}x_i, \qquad a=P_++N_-.

If N1N_-\ge1, the cases a=1a=1 and a2a\ge2 are immediate. For 1<a<21<a<2, every positive-coordinate subset satisfies

iSxiP+=aNa1<a2.\sum_{i\in S}x_i\le P_+=a-N_-\le a-1<\frac a2.

Thus normalization improves the error universally whenever total negative mass is at least 11. In particular:

  • A coordinate xi1x_i\le-1 proves Conjecture 4.1.3.
  • A sum of d1d-1 distinct coordinates at most 1-1 implies N1N_-\ge1, proving the indexed Conjecture 4.1.5.

For the remaining source conjecture, suppose some xj=v9/8x_j=v\ge9/8. Again only 1<a<21<a<2 needs consideration. Any subset containing jj has sum at least

v98a(3a)2,v\ge\frac98\ge\frac{a(3-a)}2,

since the last quadratic has maximum 9/89/8. Any positive-coordinate subset omitting jj has sum at most

av<a2.a-v<\frac a2.

Hence no forbidden subset exists, proving Conjecture 4.1.4.

The constant is sharp: for every 1<v<9/81<v<9/8, take

x=(v3/2,v),p=(0,1).x=(v-3/2,v),\qquad p=(0,1).

Then a=3/2a=3/2, but

xp1=12,xap1=24v3>12.\|x-p\|_1=\frac12, \qquad \left\|\frac xa-p\right\|_1 = 2-\frac{4v}{3} > \frac12.

For completeness, a=1a=1 gives equality identically. If 0<a<10<a<1, universal improvement occurs only for d=1,x=(a)d=1,x=(a), or d=2,x=(a/2,a/2)d=2,x=(a/2,a/2): testing p=ejp=e_j first forces all coordinates positive and then xja/2x_j\ge a/2 for every jj; the two-dimensional equal-coordinate case follows from the triangle inequality.

Source: P. Sonnentag, “Finding the Smallest Possible Exact Aggregation of a Markov Chain,” arXiv:2507.11157, equation (4.1) and Conjectures 4.1.3–4.1.5.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·