Equivalence conjecture for the vertex-operator-algebra tensor products

At least 24 years old · documented by

Let VV be a rational vertex operator algebra and let [?][?] be its category of modules, equipped with the monoidal products ⊗V\underset{\mathbb{V}}{\otimes} and ⊗HL\underset{{\text{\tiny HL}}}{\otimes}. The first is constructed from conformal blocks, while the second is the Huang–Lepowsky tensor product defined using analytic methods and intertwining operators. The map

VM,NS⟶≅Hom⁡C(V0(M,N,S′),C)\mathcal{V}^S_{M,N} \overset{\cong}{\longrightarrow} \operatorname{Hom}_\mathbb{C}(\mathbb{V}_0(M,N,S'),\mathbb{C})

is natural in the modules M,N,SM,N,S.

Tensor-product equivalence conjecture. The map above induces an equivalence of monoidal categories

(CV,⊗V)≃(CV,⊗HL).(\mathcal{C}_V,\underset{\mathbb{V}}{\otimes})\simeq (\mathcal{C}_V,\underset{{\text{\tiny HL}}}{\otimes}).

The two tensor products are already naturally isomorphic and preserve the monoidal unit VV; the remaining issue is compatibility of their associators. The expected equivalence is motivated by the fact that both associators arise from decompositions of a four-punctured sphere into three-punctured spheres, but the statement is presented as future work and is not established here.

References

Primary source

Chiara Damiolini and Lukas Woike, “Modular functors from conformal blocks of rational vertex operator algebras”, arXiv:2507.05845 (2025).

Additional references

7 papers in this index state this conjecture (2001–2025). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2404.11561, arXiv:2203.17268, arXiv:1901.02096, arXiv:1311.5217, arXiv:math/0503038, arXiv:math/0101170.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.