The bounded descent conjecture for the recursive divisor-sum sequence
Let be the recursive map on positive integers defined by
where is the sum-of-divisors function. Bounded descent conjecture. There exists a constant such that for every , there is some satisfying
This is a uniform bounded-time descent property for the recursive sequence. The supplied text does not state whether it has been resolved, so it is recorded as open.
References
Primary source
Ritesh Dwivedi and Rohit Yadav, “On a Recursive Integer Sequence Implying the Nonexistence of Odd Perfect Numbers”, arXiv:2506.01830 (2025).
Progress summary
The conjecture asks whether every starting number drops within one fixed number of steps; a submitted argument claims counterexamples, but that claim has not been verified.
Dwivedi and Yadav formulate the bounded-descent conjecture as Conjecture 3.6 for the map : some iterate among the first must be no larger than the starting value. Their paper presents it as unresolved and gives no proof or counterexample.
Known results
- Dwivedi and Yadav prove eventual descent to for an infinite family of integers built from recursively specified prime sets, but this does not provide a uniform bound on the descent time.
Community submission (unverified)
A submitted argument claims that the conjecture is false: for every odd squarefree , it asserts , and that these descent times are unbounded. The argument is incomplete in the supplied text and has no independent verification.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture remains open in the cited paper, while a community-submitted counterexample claim is unverified and therefore does not settle whether a uniform bound exists.
Sources
Solutions 1
CounterexampleThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
Unbounded descent times for the recursive divisor-sum map
In On a Recursive Integer Sequence Implying the Nonexistence of Odd Perfect Numbers, Ritesh Dwivedi and Rohit Yadav define
Their Conjecture 3.6 asserts the existence of a constant such that every positive integer satisfies
This uniform bounded-descent assertion is false. In fact, an exact formula for the first descent time holds for every odd squarefree integer and produces arbitrarily long counterexamples.
For , define
whenever the indicated set is nonempty.
Theorem. If is odd and squarefree, then
In particular, the values of on odd squarefree integers are unbounded.
Write
Multiplicativity gives
Each factor in the second product lies strictly between and , and each factor in the first product is even. Consequently,
Set
Then , and (7) ensures that the first application of is followed by at least valid halving steps. Therefore
For we have , whereas . Hence
This proves (4), including the case in which is an exact power of two.
To show that these descent times are unbounded, take the odd primorial
The divergence needed here follows directly from the finite Euler product, without any prime-distribution asymptotic. Indeed,
The first product is bounded below by the elementary telescoping product
Expanding the second finite Euler product includes every positive odd integer at most . Therefore
Now let be arbitrary. Choose large enough that
Formula (4) gives
Equivalently, this single positive integer violates every proposed descent step simultaneously:
Since the proposed constant was arbitrary, no universal bounded-descent constant exists, and Conjecture 3.6 is disproved.
The distinct Conjecture 3.5 asks whether every orbit eventually reaches . Unbounded first-descent times do not imply the existence of a nonconvergent orbit, so this counterexample makes no claim concerning that separate conjecture or the existence of odd perfect numbers.