Hendrych's NP-hardness conjecture for Bayesian A-optimal design
Hendrych's NP-hardness conjecture for Bayesian A-optimal design
Let Bayesian A-optimal design (Bayesian AOD) denote the problem of selecting a subset of design vectors to minimize the regularized trace objective
Hendrych's NP-hardness conjecture. The Bayesian AOD problem is NP-hard. This conjecture is resolved in the source: the paper proves NP-hardness for its regularized A-optimal design problem and notes that this problem is a special case of Bayesian AOD.
Progress summary
A 2025 preprint claims the conjecture is proved, and a separate posted derivation repeats that claim, but neither has independent verification.
Hendrych et al. (2023) conjectured that Bayesian A-optimal design is NP-hard. The question asks whether selecting a fixed-size subset minimizing the regularized trace objective has this computational hardness.
Known results
- Hendrych et al. (2023): posed the NP-hardness conjecture for Bayesian A-optimal design.
- Li (2025): proved NP-hardness for regularized A-optimal design by reduction from Independent Set; the paper identifies this as a special case of Bayesian A-optimal design.
Posted attempt (May 2025)
A posted derivation gives an encoding-explicit reduction using a binary design matrix and regularization parameter , claiming a complete proof through the independent-set threshold problem. This attempt has not been independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): Li’s May 2025 preprint claims to prove the conjecture through regularized A-optimal design, while the mathematical claim remains unverified by independent confirmation.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Yongchun Li, “Strong Formulations and Algorithms for Regularized A-optimal Design”, arXiv:2505.14957 (2025).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
Proof with an encoding-explicit binary reduction
The conjecture is proved as Theorem 1 of Yongchun Li's Strong Formulations and Algorithms for Regularized A-optimal Design. Since regularized A-optimal design (RAOD) is the isotropic-prior special case of Bayesian AOD, its NP-hardness implies the conjecture.
Here is a reduction using only a square binary design matrix and the fixed regularization parameter .
Let be a simple graph on , with , and set
Construct a matrix . Its rows are indexed by ordered pairs . Its first columns correspond to the vertices; its remaining columns are zero.
For every unordered pair :
- if , row has ones in columns and , while row is zero;
- if , row has a single one in column , while row has a single one in column .
Every row is zero. It follows directly that
Regard the columns of as the design vectors and set . Choose experiments. For a set of columns, let
After simultaneously permuting rows and columns,
Let be the positive eigenvalues of the first block. Their sum is , so the arithmetic-harmonic mean inequality gives
Equality holds exactly when every , equivalently when
so exactly when is independent.
Consequently,
If , then
Therefore
with equality exactly when consists of original vertex columns forming an independent set.
Finally, and have the same nonzero eigenvalues, giving
Thus, with the rational threshold
there exists a size- selection with objective at most if and only if has an independent set of size .
The construction has polynomial size, all design entries lie in , and . This is a polynomial-time reduction from Independent Set, proving RAOD NP- hard. Since RAOD is a special case of Bayesian AOD, Hendrych's conjecture follows.
Source, especially Theorem 1 and Appendix A.2: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14957