The incomparability conjecture for multigraded Frobenius series of coinvariant rings

About 1 year old · traced to

For fixed nn and nonnegative integers k,jk,j, let Rn(k,j)R_n^{(k,j)} be the corresponding multigraded coinvariant ring, and write

Frob⁡(Rn(k,j);q;u)=∑λ∈P(k,j,n)∑μ⊢ncλμsλ(q/u)sμ(z).\operatorname{Frob}(R_n^{(k,j)}; \mathbf{q};\mathbf{u}) = \sum_{\lambda \in P(k,j,n)}\sum_{\mu \vdash n} c_{\lambda\mu} s_\lambda(\mathbf{q}/\mathbf{u})s_\mu(\mathbf{z}).

For 0≤k′≤k0\leq k'\leq k and 0≤j′≤j0\leq j'\leq j, restriction determines the coefficients needed for Rn(k′,j′)R_n^{(k',j')}. Two pairs are incomparable in the componentwise order when neither is componentwise at most the other. The incomparability conjecture. When (k,j)(k,j) and (k′,j′)(k',j') are incomparable in the componentwise order, the expansion of the multigraded Frobenius series of Rn(k′,j′)R_n^{(k',j')} contains nonzero coefficients cλμc_{\lambda\mu} that are not determined by the expansion of the multigraded Frobenius series of Rn(k,j)R_n^{(k,j)}. This conjecture asserts that incomparable parameter pairs contain genuinely independent Frobenius data; whether this always occurs remains open.

References

Primary source

John Lentfer, “Diagonal supersymmetry for coinvariant rings”, arXiv:2505.14885 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.