Kagey–Rajesh characterization of the equality g(n)=2n

About 1 year old · traced to

For a non-negative integer nn, let g(n)g(n) be the smallest integer s≥ns\geq n for which there are distinct integers a1,…,at∈[n,s]a_1,\ldots,a_t\in[n,s], with a1=na_1=n, such that ∏i=1tai\prod_{i=1}^t a_i is a square. Kagey–Rajesh's conjecture. For all n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, g(n)=2ng(n)=2n if and only if n>3n>3 is prime, n=0n=0, or n=6n=6. The authors proved the “if” direction; this paper proves the “only if” direction, so the conjecture is solved.

References

Primary source

Sarosh Adenwalla, “On a Generalisation of a Function of Ron Graham's”, arXiv:2504.19196 (2025).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A 2025 preprint claims to complete the proof, but no independent verification of its argument was found.

In 2024, Peter Kagey and Krishna Rajesh formulated the characterization of when the smallest square-producing interval reaches 2n2n. Their work established one direction and left the converse as a conjecture.

Known results

  • Kagey and Rajesh (2024) proved the “if” direction and gave structural results, an algorithm, and bounds for g(n)g(n).
  • Their paper stated the converse characterization as Conjecture 37.

April 27, 2025 claimed completion

The preprint On a Generalisation of a Function of Ron Graham’s states that its Theorem 3.4 proves the “only if” direction, giving g2(n)=2ng_2(n)=2n exactly when n>3n>3 is prime, n=0n=0, or n=6n=6. This would solve the stated Kagey–Rajesh conjecture, but the retrieved sources provide no independent verification, gap report, or publication confirmation.

Current status (as of September 2026): The conjecture is claimed solved by the April 2025 preprint, but that claim remains unverified in the retrieved record.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.