The elliptico--toric conjecture

About 1 year old · traced to

Let E\mathcal{E} be an elliptic curve with period lattice Ω\Omega, invariants g2,g3g_2,g_3, and endomorphism field kk. Let s,n≥0s,n\geq0, let et1,…,ets\mathrm{e}^{t_1},\dots,\mathrm{e}^{t_s} be points of Gm(C)\mathbb{G}_m(\mathbb{C}), and let P1,…,PnP_1,\dots,P_n be points of E(C)\mathcal{E}(\mathbb{C}), with Pi=[℘(pi):℘′(pi):1]P_i=[\wp(p_i):\wp'(p_i):1]. Let KK be the field defined in the source, containing the exponential and elliptic-function data. Define ⟨tℓ⟩ℓ\langle t_\ell\rangle_\ell as the Q\mathbb{Q}-span of the classes of the tℓt_\ell in C/2πiQ\mathbb{C}/2\pi\mathrm{i}\mathbb{Q}, and ⟨pi⟩i\langle p_i\rangle_i as the kk-span of the classes of the pip_i in C/(Ω⊗ZQ)\mathbb{C}/(\Omega\otimes_\mathbb{Z}\mathbb{Q}). Elliptico--toric conjecture.

tran.deg⁡K(ω1,ω2,η1,η2)≥dim⁡Q⟨tℓ⟩ℓ+4[k:Q]+2dim⁡k⟨pi⟩i.\operatorname{tran.deg} K(\omega_1,\omega_2,\eta_1,\eta_2) \geq \dim_{\mathbb{Q}}\langle t_\ell\rangle_\ell+\frac{4}{[k:\mathbb{Q}]}+2\dim_k\langle p_i\rangle_i.

This is attributed in the source to Bertrand and is equivalent there to a Grothendieck--André generalized period conjecture for a suitable 1-motive. It remains open.

References

Primary source

Cristiana Bertolin and Michel Waldschmidt, “Variations on Schanuel's Conjecture for elliptic and quasi-elliptic functions I: the split case”, arXiv:2504.14048 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.