The period-integral commutator relation

Assume the setup denoted by \threfcommsetup\thref{commsetup}, and let I={1,2}I=\{1,2\} and [I]={1}[I]=\{1\}. Let cVW,\ftwoc_{V\boxtimes W,\ftwo}, cWV,\ftwoc_{W\boxtimes V,\ftwo}, and cVW,\fonec_{V\otimes W,\fone} be the elements defined via the period-push construction.

Period-integral commutator relation. Under \threfcommsetup\thref{commsetup},

cVW,\ftwocWV,\ftwo=\coev(cVW,\fone)\Cor\hkG,\ftwo\glob,\ICVW(\cPX\ukC2,\cPX\ukC2dV+dW).c_{V\boxtimes W,\ftwo}-c_{W\boxtimes V,\ftwo}=\coev(c_{V\otimes W,\fone})\in\Cor_{\hk^{\glob}_{G,\ftwo},\IC_{V\boxtimes W}}(\cP_X\boxtimes\uk_{C^2},\cP_X\boxtimes\uk_{C^2}\langle d_V+d_W\rangle).

The relation reformulates the automorphic commutator identity using the period-push construction and the coevaluation map. Its status is not specified in the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Shurui Liu and Zeyu Wang, “Higher Period Integrals and Derivatives of L-functions”, arXiv:2504.00275 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.